Resticula nyssa Harring & Myers 1924
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resticula nyssa Harring & Myers, 1924 A few specimens were found in the samples. The species is a rare cosmopolite and has also been recorded from Europe (Wulfert 1940; KochAlthaus 1962, 1963; Koste 1965, 1968, 1976; Berzins 1978), Tasmania (Koste & Shiel 1991), the United States (Harring & Myers 1924; Berzins 1978), Arctic Canada (Nogrady & Smol 1989; De Smet & Bafort 1990; De Smet & Beyens 1995) and Svalbard (De Smet 1988, 1993). The species is new to Greenland. The species is distinguished by its trophi morphology and absence of a true eyespot. The recorded specimens were generally typical. Trophi from one specimen were prepared for SEM. The rami are large and triangular. The apical rami parts are lamellate, forming an apical basket (Fig. 4). A pair of pleural rods with fanned ends is attached to the dorsal side of the rami (Fig. 4 A). The fulcrum is long with a dorsally curved terminal tip. Unci have two teeth, furthermore, left uncus has five accessory teeth forming a fan. Manubria are composed of a welldeveloped proximal head and a caudal rod. The proximal head contains three chambers. Anterior and posterior chambers have large apertures; the medial chamber has a smaller aperture in the distal part of the manubrium head (Fig. 4 A). Measurements: Trophi 50 µm; rami 28 µm; fulcrum 29 µm; manubria 30 µm; unci 13 µm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".