MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6950366989 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6323402

Exploring XmoA gene profiles in Saanich Inlet with TreeSAPP

2022· other· en· W6950366989 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInletMetagenomicsGeneSequence (biology)Cruise

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is a package of FASTQ and FASTA files containing subsetted data from Saanich Inlet Cruise 72. These data are intended for the purpose of demonstrating the utility of TreeSAPP for gene-centric metagenome interpretation. This dataset is integrated with UBC's Microbiology and Immunology class, MICB425. A bookdown for the tutorial is available on GitHub: https://github.com/EDUCE-UBC/MICB425 Sequences were subset according to their relationship to the XmoA (CuMMO protein family) gene. Content: 6.9M SI072_100m_MetaT_QC_Filtered.fq.gz 741K SI072_100m_pe.1.fq.gz 739K SI072_100m_pe.2.fq.gz 31K SI072_10m_MetaT_QC_Filtered.fq.gz 12K SI072_10m_pe.1.fq.gz 13K SI072_10m_pe.2.fq.gz 6.4M SI072_120m_MetaT_QC_Filtered.fq.gz 563K SI072_120m_pe.1.fq.gz 561K SI072_120m_pe.2.fq.gz 6.3M SI072_135m_MetaT_QC_Filtered.fq.gz 638K SI072_135m_pe.1.fq.gz 637K SI072_135m_pe.2.fq.gz 6.1M SI072_150m_MetaT_QC_Filtered.fq.gz 538K SI072_150m_pe.1.fq.gz 535K SI072_150m_pe.2.fq.gz 1.4M SI072_165m_MetaT_QC_Filtered.fq.gz 951K SI072_165m_pe.1.fq.gz 947K SI072_165m_pe.2.fq.gz 114K SI072_200m_MetaT_QC_Filtered.fq.gz 75K SI072_200m_pe.1.fq.gz 75K SI072_200m_pe.2.fq.gz 18M SI072_MAGs.fa 8.2K SI072_MAGs_gtdbtk.bac120.summary.tsv 85K SI072_MetaG_contigs.fasta

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.969
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.140 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicGeological formations and processes→French-language works237,207→