MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950367640 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6869622

Sorex tundrensis Merriam 1900

2018· article· en· W6950367640 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBanana Cultivation and Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSorexShrewSubspeciesAraneusTundraHolarctic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

23. Tundra Shrew Sorex tundrensis French: Musaraigne de la toundra / German: Tundra-Rotzahnspitzmaus / Spanish: Musarafia de tundra Other common names: Holarctic Shrew Taxonomy. Sorex tundrensis Merriam, 1900, “ St. Michaels, Alaska,” USA. Sorex tundrensis is currently included in the subgenus Sorex and is closely related to S. asper, which is close to the araneus group based on karyotype and mtDNA and nDNA sequencing. Ten subspecies recognized. Subspecies and Distribution. S.t.tundrensisMerriam,1900—Alaskaincluding S.t. Lawrence and Kodiak Is (USA) and N & W Yukon, extreme NE British Columbia, and N Northwest Territories (NW Canada). S.t.baikalensisOgnev,1913—TransbaikaliaandtheadjacentstepperegionofNMongolia(KhentiiMts);thissubspeciesmayalsooccurintheforest-steppeofNMongoliatoLakeKhuvsgul. S.t.borealisKastschenko,1905—ESiberiantundrafromYeniseiGulfEtoChukchiPeninsula(ERussia). S.t.buxtoniJ.A.Allen,1903—ESiberiantaigafromVilyuyRiverBasinEtoOkhotskSeacoast(ERussia). S.t.parvicaudatusOkhotina,1976—MoneronI,CSeaofJapan. S.t.petschoraeOgnev,1921—UralMtsandWSiberiaEtoYeniseiRiver(CRussia). S.t.schnitnikoviOgnev,1921—C&SAltaiandmountainsofEKazakhstan(Tarbagatai,Saur,andDzungarianAlatau)andNWChina(Xinjiang). S.t.sibiriensisOgnev,1921—W&CSiberia,KuznetskAlatau,NEAltai,SayanMts,andTuva(SCRussia). S.t.stroganoviYudin,1979—PrimorskyKrai(SRussianFarEast);thissubspeciesmayalsooccurinNEChinaandAmurRegion(ERussia). S. t. transrypheus S.t., 1956 — W Siberia (C Russia) and N Kazakhstan. Subspecific distribution in various parts of the range is uncertain. Descriptive notes. Head-body 61-86 mm (immatures 52-70 mm), tail 20-38 mm (immatures 34-44 mm), ear 7-8 mm, hindfoot 13-15 mm; weight 8-11-5 g (immatures 4-8-7-5 g). The Tundra Shrew is medium-sized, with striking color. Pelage is generally bicolored in the Palearctic (deep brown to nearly black on back and whitish on sides and venter). Pelage is generally more noticeably tricolored during the summer and more bicolored during the winter. Summer pelage is dark brown to nearly black dorsally, lighter brown along the sides, and whitish ventrally, while winter pelage is more uniformly colored deep reddish brown to brown dorsally and whitish ventrally. Feet are dark; ears are short and barely extend past fur. Tail is ¢.50% of head-body length and sharply bicolored, dark brown above and lighter below. Tooth ridges (except for on unicuspids as in other species in the Sorex subgenus) are pigmented dark red, and there are five unicuspids that get smaller from first to fifth, with first two being significantly larger than last three, while last three gradually get smaller until the diminutive fifth. Chromosomal complementis extremely variable: 2n = 31-41 and FN = 56-60 in Siberia, 2n = 32 or 33 and FN = 58 in the Yukon; and 2n = 32 or 33 and FN = 62 in Alaska. This variation results from Robertsonian translocations effecting five autosomal chromosomes. Trivalent of sex chromosomes consists of large metacentric X-chromosome, small acrocentric Y-chromosome, and medium-sized acrocentric Y,chromosome. Habitat. Large variety of alpine, subalpine, and arctic habitats, shrublands, and meadows, often dominated by small trees and shrubs such as willow and birch, generally preferring open bush habitats. The Tundra Shrew is more efficient at colonizing tundra and steppe habitats than other species of shrews. It prefers to live in floodplain regions throughout taiga, avoiding forests, and in open areas between forests. Food and Feeding. Because Tundra Shrews live in various habitats, food items differ greatly among different geographical regions. For example, earthworms account for substantial proportions of diets in tundra, spiders and insects (commonly beetles) in taiga, and grasshoppers in steppe regions. Plant items are often included in diets, especially in winter; berries are eaten in southern regions of the distribution in Kazakhstan and pore fungi (Favolaschia, Mycenaceae) on Chukchi Peninsula. Breeding. Breeding of the Tundra Shrew generally occurs from late winter until early summer. Breeding season usually starts in May, and firstjuveniles appear by mid-June. Reproduction lasts until late August, and lactating females can be captured in early September. Up to 100% of female young-of-the-year reproduce in northern populations in someyears, and this distinguishes Tundra Shrew from other species of Sorex. A female has up to three litters in a breeding season. Reproductive rate can be extremely high in northern populations: 15 embryos were observed in single females in Yenisei forest-tundra, and mean number of embryos/female was 10-7 on Chukchi Peninsula. In southern regions, mean number of embryos/female is far lower: 5-7 in the Dzungarian Alatau and five in central Yeniseitaiga. Litters have 1-3 young on the Moneron Island where most females have only one litter in a breeding season. Activity patterns. Tundra Shrews are active day and night and are primarily terrestrial. Movements, Home range and Social organization. The Tundra Shrew is probably most similar to the Common Shrew (S. araneus) in its general ecology. It is solitary except when breeding and rearing young. Status and Conservation. Classified as Least Concern on The IUCN Red List. The Tundra Shrew is wide ranging and found in many different habitat types, although it might be threatened by effects of global climate change because it is found at higher latitudes. Tundra Shrews often dominate shrew communities in forest-steppe and forest-tundra regions and are sometimes the only shrew in the community of small mammals. It is on the Red Lists of Magadan and Sakhalin regions. In the latter case, this pertains to the subspecies parvicaudatus that lives only on Moneron Island. Bibliography. Andreev et al. (2006), Bannikova et al. (2010), Bekenov et al. (1985), Bobretsov et al. (2008), Churchfield & Sheftel (1994), George (1988), Hope et al. (2011), Jackson (1928), Junge & Hoffmann (1981), Junge et al. (1983), Lukéadova et al. (1996), Moraleva (1987), Nesterenko (1999), Okhotina (1984), Sheftel (1983), Volpert & Shadrina (2002), Volobouev (1989), Volpert & Shadrina (2002), Yudin (1989), Zaitsev et al. (2014).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.728
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0570.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicBanana Cultivation and ResearchFrench-language works237,207