Dendronotus robilliardi Korshunova, Sanamyan, Zimina, Fletcher, Martynov 2016
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dendronotus robilliardi Korshunova, Sanamyan, Zimina, Fletcher & Martynov, 2016 Fig. 7 Dendronotus robilliardi Korshunova, Sanamyan, Zimina, Fletcher & Martynov, 2016: 28–32, Figs 2, 3, 5. Extendeddiagnosis. Body narrow. Fivetoeight pairs (commonly more than six) of branched dorsolateral appendages, digestive gland penetrates at least three pairs of dorolateral appendages. Four to six appendages of oral veil. Four to six appendages of rhinophoral stalks. Lateral papilla of rhinophoral sheaths present. Rhinophoreswith 11–15 lamellae. Five to ten lip papillae. Basal colour white, dorsolateral appendage variable opaque orange or opaque white, including tip. Dorsal processes of jaws inclined posteriorly at approximately 50–60° to the longitudinal axis of the jaw body and 0.43–0.45 of its length. Radula with up to 43 rows of teeth. Masticatory processes with ridge-like structures and smaller denticles. Central tooth with up to 17 small, distinct denticles without furrows. Up to nine lateral teeth with upto eight denticles. Ampulla is hook-shaped to swollen kidney-shaped, with various degrees of folding. Bursa copulatrix large, rounded, withsmallseminalreceptaculum placed distally at a short distance from the vaginal opening. Prostate discoid with about 19–30 alveolar glands. The vas deferens is short, penis relatively short, curved. Body length up to 35 mm. Distribution. NW (from South Korea to Commander Islands) and NE Pacific (from Alaska to at least Washington State, Canada and USA). Northern Japan (photographic record only, Korshunova et al., 2019b). Depth. circa 5– 30 m. Remarks. See Remarks for D. albus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".