Bibliographic record
Abstract
Subfamily Nereidinae Blainville, 1818 Genus Composetia Hartmann-Schröder, 1985 Ceratonereis (Composetia) Hartmann-Schröder 1985: 49. Composetia Bakken & Wilson 2005: 520–521. Type species. Ceratonereis (Composetia) costae (Grube, 1840) (designated by Hartmann-Schröder 1985) Remarks. Composetia was erected as a subgenus of Ceratonereis Kinberg, 1865 by Hartmann-Schröder (1985: 49) with 29 species listed for the subgenus, including Ceratonereis (Composetia) burmensis (Monro, 1937) (Burma). Bakken & Wilson (2005) elevated Composetia to generic rank and assigned only two species to this genus, which are C. irritabilis (Webster, 1879) (Virginia, USA) and C. scotiae (Berkeley & Berkeley, 1956) (Nova Scotia, Canada). The other 27 species of Ceratonereis (Composetia), including type species of this newly ranked genus are excluded due to insufficient information. The status of these 27 Ceratonereis (Composetia) species remains unsolved today. Wu (1967) did report C. (C.) burmensis from Taiwan. Lee & Glasby (2015) synonymised Ceratonereis (Composetia) burmensis with Neanthes glandicincta Southern, 1921. Therefore, the report of Composetia in the present study represents the first record of the genus for Taiwan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".