Bibliographic record
Abstract
Orthacheta cornuta (Loew, 1863) Figs 8, 166–174. cornuta Loew, 1863: 26 (Cordylura). Type-locality: “English River” (Canada, Ontario). fuscipennis Hendel, 1930: 8 (Orthochaeta). Type-locality: “Klutchi” (Russia, Kamchatka Kray). Remarks. Besides Hendel’s (1930: 8, as fuscipennis) record from Kamchatka, this species was recorded for the Russian Far East by Ozerov & Krivosheina (2014b: 215). Material examined. Arkhangelsk Oblast: Nar'yan-Mar (67.631761N, 52.985770E), 7.VII.2008, N.E. Vikhrev (2 ♂♂, ZMUM); Kamchatka Kray: Bay Vestnik (51.4823N 157.5301E), 27.VII.1999, A. Leley, S. Storozhenko (1 ♀, ZMUM); Valley of Geysers (ca. 54.43N 160.15E), 12.VIII.1985, V. Zlobin (2 ♂♂, 1 ♀, ZISP); Komi: Schel'yaboj (66.29N 56.45E), 14.VIII.1978, Gorodkov (1 ♂, ZISP); Inta (66.0362N 60.1628E), 5.VIII.1985, Gorodkov (1 ♂, ZISP); Krasnoyarsk Kray: Igarka (67.457N 86.598E), Enisey, 30.VI.1967, Gorodkov (8 ♂♂, ZISP). Diagnostic description. Body-length 5.0–7.0 mm. Head. Frons usually black in upper part and yellow in lower third or half. Postpedicel approximately 3 times as long as pedicel. Thorax black, grey dusted. Proepisternum with hairs in central part. Katepisternum with 3 strong setae, in ventral corner with yellow setae. Legs yellow, only tarsi darkened. Fore coxae with white hairs. Femora slender. Wing usually distinctly brownish. Abdomen black, greyish dusted. Male sternite 4 rectangular, 2 times as long as wide (Fig. 169). Male sternite 5 as in Fig. 166. Epandrium, cerci and surstyli as in Figs 167, 168. Distribution. Russia (Fig. 170): Arkhangelsk Oblast and Komi (first record for Europe), Kamchatka Kray, Krasnoyarsk Kray, Primorskiy Kray.—North America.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".