MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950398706 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6785205

A Capillary Probe for Ion Extraction from Liquid Xenon

2022· article· en· W6950398706 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNeutrino Physics Research
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsXenonMAJORANATime projection chamberDetectorScintillationIonNeutrinoDouble beta decayLiquid scintillation countingExtraction (chemistry)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Double beta decay is a process whereby two neutrons simultaneously decay into protons, emitting two electrons. The 100 kg scale EXO-200 precisely measured these decays with the emission of two neutrinos (136Xe 2νββ), with a half-life to be 2.165±0.016(stat)±0.059(syst)×1021 years. If the neutrino is a Majorana fermion, double beta decays are also possible without the emission of any neutrinos. EXO-200 placed one of the most stringent lower limits on the 136Xe 0νββ decay half-life at 3.5×1025 years. Multi-ton detectors like the 5t nEXO are planned with ∼100 times greater reach. nEXO's projected half-life sensitivity is 1.35×1028 years. This is accomplished by stringent control of all sources of background, along with taking advantage of the rich energy and topological information and the exquisite self-shielding of a large time projection chamber (TPC) with scintillation light readout.Future upgraded detectors could also observe the 136Ba ions resulting from 136Xe double beta decays (so-named barium tagging) and eliminate all background signals other than the 2νββ decay. The high efficiency detection of a single ion following a double beta decay event in a potentially multi-ton detector medium is a challenging task. One proposed scheme is to extract 136Ba ions by flowing xenon through a small capillary for transport to subsequent stages of detection. Progress at Carleton University on the development of a capillary-based probe for individual ion extraction from liquid xenon will be presented, along with details of the experimental apparatus and the simulations of each step of the extraction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicNeutrino Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207