MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950402823 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6521462

Tribochrysa inaequalis Scudder 1885

2022· article· en· W6950402823 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFossil Insects in Amber
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityRoyal British Columbia Museum
Fundersnot available
KeywordsType localityHolotypeDome (geology)ErebidaeVenturia inaequalis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tribochrysa inaequalis Scudder, 1885 Fig. 23 Tribochrysa inaequalis Scudder, 1885: 777, Fig. 982; Scudder 1890: 169, 170; Scudder 1891: 380; Handlirsch 1906–1908 [1907]: 909; Cockerell 1908a: 90; Cockerell 1909a: 78; Carpenter 1935: 267, Fig. 6; Adams 1967: 232; Schlüter 1982: 260, 261; Schlüter 1984: 4; Martins-Neto & Vulcano 1989: 189, 190, Fig. 1D; Séméria & Nel 1990: 30; Carpenter 1992: 348, Fig. 193,3; Meyer 2003: 208; Nel et al. 2005: 67; Makarkin & Archibald 2013: 143; Archibald & Makarkin 2015: 361. Type material. Holotype MCZ 243 (Scudder’s no. 7982). A poorly-preserved articulate specimen in probably dorso-lateral aspect. Verbatim label data [typed]: (1) “Mus. Comparative Zoölogy, Cambridge / No. 243/ Tribochrysa inaequalis / Scud / Florissant Miocene”; (2) [handwritten]: “ 243 type Tribochrysa inaequalis Scud / Florissant / Neuroptera: Chrysopidae ”. The specimen has red and black ink writing on the rock that says “7982 / 243”, and a red paper label glued to the rock that says “Type.”. The specimen is covered with Canada balsam. Type locality and horizon. USA: Colorado: Teller County: Florissant (precise collecting locality unknown); Eocene, late Priabonian; Florissant Formation. Diagnosis. May be distinguished from T. firmata by more closely spaced subcostal veinlets (seven between origin of RP and third ra-rp) [T. firmata: five– six]; 10 branches of RP [T. firmata: eight]. Redescription. Body very poorly preserved, with only one eye well discernible (ca. 0.5 mm in diameter). Forewing ca. 12.5 mm long, ca. 4.7 wide (length to width ratio 2.66). Costal space relatively narrow. Preserved subcostal veinlets simple, widely spaced. Pterostigma, distal part of Sc, RA not discernible. RA with nine preserved crossveins (apparently ten complete). Origin of RP relatively far from wing base (at ca. 0.22 complete length). Anterior trace of RP zigzagged, with ten branches. Basal crossvein between RP, M (1r-m) rather long, connecting anterior trace of RP, MA within im at nearly proximal one-fourth length. M arched proximad fork; dividing to MA, MP distad level of origin of RP. MA, MP strongly curved; MA rather shallowly forked distad Psc; MP deeply forked at Psc. Crossvein between MA, MP (1im) rather long. Im elongate, almost not divergent distally (length/width 4.2). Psm poorly developed, strongly zigzagged. Crossvein 2m-cu very long, connecting im, CuA at nearly proximal one-ninths im length. CuA probably with three simple branches. Psc rather well developed, slightly zigzagged. CuP deeply forked. Crossvein 2icu connecting CuA, anterior branch of CuP proximad 2m-cu. CuA, A1 closely approaching for short distance. A1, A2 simple. Two gradate series of crossveins: inner series arranged in strongly broken line, with eight preserved crossveins distad MA (apparently 8–9 complete); outer series arranged in slightly curved line, with seven crossveins distad RP2 (apparently eight complete). Hind wing very poorly preserved. Remarks. Much of the fossil is obscured by a covering of Canada balsam, and so we are only able to describe the forewing venation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.426
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1410.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicFossil Insects in AmberFrench-language works237,207