Sayloria bicoloripes Pacheco & Monné & Vaz-De & Ahrens 2021, comb. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sayloria bicoloripes (Saylor, 1946) comb. nov. Figs 5K–O, 7C Astaena bicoloripes Saylor, 1946: 226. Astaena postnodata Frey, 1973: 339 syn. nov. Symmela (Sayloria) bicoloripes – Frey 1973: 324 (new subgenus, identification key). Symmela bicoloripes – Evans 2003: 47 (checklist). — Evans & Smith 2005: 29 (checklist); 2007: 30 (checklist); 2009: 30 (checklist). Astaena postnodata – Evans 2003: 27 (checklist). — Evans & Smith 2005: 12 (checklist); 2007: 12 (checklist); 2009: 12 (checklist). Type material examined Holotype (Astaena bicoloripes) PERU • ♀; “M. Sani Beni Lima Peru. 35 / L.W. Saylor Collection / California Academy of Sciences Type nº 7908 / Holotype Astaena bicoloripes L.W. Saylor / Symmela bicoloripes Saylor det. G. Frey ”; CAS. Paratype (Astaena bicoloripes) PERU • 1 ♂; “M. Sani Beni Lima Peru. 35 / L.W. Saylor Collection / Paratype Astaena bicoloripes L.W. Saylor / Astaena bicoloripes Saylor / CASENT 8438129”; CAS. Holotype (Astaena postnodata) PERU • ♂; “ Mt. Alegre, Rio Pachitea O. Peru G. Tessmann / Type Astaena postnodata G. Frey 1973 ”; ZMHB. Paratypes (Astaena postnodata) PERU • 4 ♀♀; “ Mt. Alegre, Rio Pachitea O. Peru G. Tessmann / Paratype Astaena postnodata G. Frey 1973 ”; ZMHB. Additional material examined PERU • 1 ♂; “Dept. Cusco, PERU Santa Isabel Cosnipata Valley Dec 5 1951 Felix Woytkowski / H. & A. Howden collection Ottawa Canada”; CMNC • 6 ♂♂, 5 ♀♀; “ Mt. Alegro, Rio Pachitea o. Peru G. Tessmann ”; ZFMK, ZMHB, NHMB. Holotype redescription MEASUREMENTS. Length: 6.5 mm. Width: 4 mm. HEAD. Black, surface with upright setae. Labroclypeus convex, shape of anterior margin weakly sinuated medially, posteriorly with dense punctation. Ocular canthus with terminal setae, ratio to eye: 1/3. Eyes, ratio diameter/interocular width: 0.44. Antennae with nine antennomeres; antennal club with three antennomeres; ratio antennal club/remaining antennomeres: 1/1; ratio third vs fourth antennomere: 1/2; fourth antennomere, lateral projection absent; ratio fifth vs fourth antennomere: 1.2/1. PRONOTUM AND ELYTRA. Surface of pronotum and elytra without setae. Pronotum unicolored, brownishorange, widest at base, anterior marginal line present, posterior marginal line absent, lateral margin strongly convex and smooth (not serrate), antero-lateral angle dorso-ventrally not flattened, posterolateral angle dorso-ventrally not flattened, punctation on disc dense, setae of lateral margin sparse, median longitudinal excavation present. Scutellum, punctures medially present. Elytra bicolored, surface opaque, microsculpture absent, punctation on intervals present and sparse, diameter of strial and interval punctation equal. ABDOMEN. Lateral carina present. Second visible ventrite without row of setae in medial region. Apical visible ventrite without suture to apical tergite. LEGS. Ratio of length of metepisternum/metacoxa: 1/0.90. Metacoxa without longer lateral bristles, a laterally extended longitudinal shelf present. Metatibia, widest at apex, ratio of width/length: 1/3, dorsal margin not carinated. ventral margin serrated, distal spines groups disposed at two thirds of metatibial length. First metatarsomere, ratio to dorsal metatibial spur: 1/3. Dorsal surface of tarsi glabrous, without punctures. Metatarsi, length of first protarsomere subequal to second and third combined, ventral margin serrated and setose. Protibia with three teeth. Protarsi, length of first protarsomere subequal to second and third combined, second protarsomere narrow, claws asymmetrical, inner protarsal claw bifid, apex of basal tooth of inner protarsal claw truncate. AEDEAGUS. Fig. 5K–L. Remarks Also, in this case, the holotype was a female specimen; Saylor mentioned in the original description that the holotype was a male.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".