Archaeological recording arising from the renewal of drainage outside the West Front of Exeter Cathedral, 2014
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Archaeological recording during the excavation of drainage parallel to the west front of Exeter Cathedral. In section the stratification lies at least0.3m below the level of the 14th-century image screen, whose ground level is the same as the modern one. Therefore, the deposits are likely to be of earlier date than the 14th century. Judging by the deposits seen elsewhere at the W end of the Close, one deposit could be Post-Roman; however the underlying deposits are almost certainly Roman. A slate fragment was found in context (8), indicating a date from the late 2nd century, when slate came into common use in Exeter. The deposits therefore relate to the later Roman town. No trace was seen of the accumulated layers of Roman street recorded in 1976; the sole recorded column of stratification presumably represents late Roman dumped deposits, within the insula to the NE of the street. This indicates that the street edge must lie a little further to the N of the position where it has been projected by previous work. No human bones were encountered. No finds were retained.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".