High Hydrogen - Experimental results, detailed analysis, evaluation and recommendations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The report contains details for the complete project. This project commenced in 2011 and has completed works at the end of 2016.There have been three previous sections to this project: a literature review, laboratory scale experiments and a circular duct phase; this last phase incorporated a scale heat recovery steam generating boiler.<br><br>The project has been shown to be able to simulate several of the relevant features of a full scale HRSG system using the current scaled test rig and to demonstrate the development of flame through the system and the generation of pressures, which are believed to be relevant to the understanding of how these will develop at full scale.The commissioning tests carried out have given confidence in the overall operation of the test rig in terms of achieving appropriate gas temperatures, injected fuel mixtures and equivalence ratios; exhaust/injected fuel mixing and HRSG purging times ahead of actual ignition. Detailed flow measurements at selected positions within the system have confirmed the uniformity of the flow in these regions and have provided background turbulence data for future flow and combustion modelling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".