Lithophane lanei Troubridge, 2006, new species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lithophane lanei new species (Figs. 1, 4, 9) Diagnosis. Lithophane lanei flies with and could be confused with L. hemina Grote. The genitalia are similar, but the two species can be distinguished by the distinct, blackish brown subreniform spot (similar to that of L. patefacta Walker) which is present in L. lanei but absent or paler and reduced in L. hemina, and the darker, charred appearance the forewing of L. lanei, paler and less hoary in L. hemina. Description. (Fig. 1). Holotype: Forewing length 17 mm. Antenna filiform, ciliate; eye orbicular, lashed; head brown with black line between eyes; labial palpus brown with black line along outer edge; thoracic collar brown basally with black medial line, buff terminally; thoracic tuft gray brown basally with black medial line, edged with buff; tegula, thorax, and abdomen mottled brown; abdomen tufted. Dorsal forewing brown; basal dash blackish brown; antemedial and postmedial lines deeply saggitate, angled towards diffuse, darker brown median shade, these lines barely visible between veins but most obvious as tan dots on veins, bordered anteriorly and posteriorly with black dots; saggitate subterminal line tan, edged basally with chestnut brown, distally with blackish brown; reniform and oblong orbicular spots slightly paler than ground of wing; prominent blackish brown subreniform spot extends from antemedial line to postmedial line. Fringe brown. Dorsal hindwing light gray brown basally, darker in distal 1/3 and darker discal lunule; fringe brown. Male genitalia (Fig. 4). Valve with small cucullus and corona present. Digitus with small spine near base of clasper and longer spine extending from tip of valve, below cucullus. Clasper arcs upward, then downward and inward. Uncus bearded, thickens slightly medially, pointed at tip. Vesica bulbous, bending upward and to the right with a small subapical diverticulum; a small patch of cornuti present at base of ductus seminalis. Female genitalia (Fig. 9). Ostium bursae with prominent knoblike process on ventral margin; ductus bursae with heavily sclerotized ventral plate, twisting around to dorsal surface at appendix bursae; ductus bursae bends to the right. Appendix bursae reduced to a bulge on posterior end of bursa. Bursa elongate with long signa on dorsal and ventral surfaces. Ovipositor lobes with fine setae. Type material. Holotype male: Canada, Ontario, Stittsville [Ottawa], 45°12.03’N, 75°58.80’W, 6 April 2005, J. Troubridge (CNC). Paratypes: Ontario: 17 males, 8 females, same data as holotype; 1 male, Stittsville [Ottawa], 45° 12.03’ N, 75° 58.80’ W, 22 March, 2004, J. Troubridge; 2 males, Stittsville [Ottawa], 45° 12.03’ N, 75° 58.80’ W, 21 April, 2003, J. Troubridge; 4 males, 1 female, Carp Ridge,. 45° 23.05’ N, 76° 04.80’ W, 18 April 2005, J. Troubridge; 2 males, Carp Ridge, 45° 23.05’ N, 76° 04.80’ W, 21 September 2004, J. Troubridge. Paratypes in the CNC and JTT. Derivation of the name. I name this species for Harley Lane, who helped to collect the type series. Distribution and habitat. Lithophane lanei was collected in mixed forest in rural granite and limestone areas within the city of Ottawa, Ontario. Nothing is known of its life history.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".