MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950419629 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6262618

Lithophane lanei Troubridge, 2006, new species

2006· article· en· W6950419629 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicDiptera species taxonomy and behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlack spotDorsumCollarDorsal finApex (geometry)Bristle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lithophane lanei new species (Figs. 1, 4, 9) Diagnosis. Lithophane lanei flies with and could be confused with L. hemina Grote. The genitalia are similar, but the two species can be distinguished by the distinct, blackish brown subreniform spot (similar to that of L. patefacta Walker) which is present in L. lanei but absent or paler and reduced in L. hemina, and the darker, charred appearance the forewing of L. lanei, paler and less hoary in L. hemina. Description. (Fig. 1). Holotype: Forewing length 17 mm. Antenna filiform, ciliate; eye orbicular, lashed; head brown with black line between eyes; labial palpus brown with black line along outer edge; thoracic collar brown basally with black medial line, buff terminally; thoracic tuft gray brown basally with black medial line, edged with buff; tegula, thorax, and abdomen mottled brown; abdomen tufted. Dorsal forewing brown; basal dash blackish brown; antemedial and postmedial lines deeply saggitate, angled towards diffuse, darker brown median shade, these lines barely visible between veins but most obvious as tan dots on veins, bordered anteriorly and posteriorly with black dots; saggitate subterminal line tan, edged basally with chestnut brown, distally with blackish brown; reniform and oblong orbicular spots slightly paler than ground of wing; prominent blackish brown subreniform spot extends from antemedial line to postmedial line. Fringe brown. Dorsal hindwing light gray brown basally, darker in distal 1/3 and darker discal lunule; fringe brown. Male genitalia (Fig. 4). Valve with small cucullus and corona present. Digitus with small spine near base of clasper and longer spine extending from tip of valve, below cucullus. Clasper arcs upward, then downward and inward. Uncus bearded, thickens slightly medially, pointed at tip. Vesica bulbous, bending upward and to the right with a small subapical diverticulum; a small patch of cornuti present at base of ductus seminalis. Female genitalia (Fig. 9). Ostium bursae with prominent knob­like process on ventral margin; ductus bursae with heavily sclerotized ventral plate, twisting around to dorsal surface at appendix bursae; ductus bursae bends to the right. Appendix bursae reduced to a bulge on posterior end of bursa. Bursa elongate with long signa on dorsal and ventral surfaces. Ovipositor lobes with fine setae. Type material. Holotype male: Canada, Ontario, Stittsville [Ottawa], 45°12.03’N, 75°58.80’W, 6 April 2005, J. Troubridge (CNC). Paratypes: Ontario: 17 males, 8 females, same data as holotype; 1 male, Stittsville [Ottawa], 45° 12.03’ N, 75° 58.80’ W, 22 March, 2004, J. Troubridge; 2 males, Stittsville [Ottawa], 45° 12.03’ N, 75° 58.80’ W, 21 April, 2003, J. Troubridge; 4 males, 1 female, Carp Ridge,. 45° 23.05’ N, 76° 04.80’ W, 18 April 2005, J. Troubridge; 2 males, Carp Ridge, 45° 23.05’ N, 76° 04.80’ W, 21 September 2004, J. Troubridge. Paratypes in the CNC and JTT. Derivation of the name. I name this species for Harley Lane, who helped to collect the type series. Distribution and habitat. Lithophane lanei was collected in mixed forest in rural granite and limestone areas within the city of Ottawa, Ontario. Nothing is known of its life history.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicDiptera species taxonomy and behaviorFrench-language works237,207