MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6950431922 · doi:10.5683/sp3/usuvvs

Bathymetry: Lake Opinicon

2013· dataset· en· W6950431922 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueBorealis · 2013
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShoreInflowHydrology (agriculture)Salt lakeWork (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lake Opinicon is bordered by QUBS Point, Sugarbush Island, the Bonwill Tract and the Cape-Sauriol Environmental Studies Area (Concession 14, Lots 15-16; Concession 15, Lots 16-20; Concession 16, Lots 1-2, Concession 17, Lots 1-3; Concession 18, Lots 1-2 of South Frontenac Township, Frontenac County and Concession 7, Lots 13-16; Concession 8, Lots 12-17; Concession 9, Lots 13-16; Concession 10, Lots 14-16 of Rideau Lakes Township, Leeds and Grenville County). Mean depth = 2.8 m; maximum depth = 11.3 m; surface area = 788.0 ha, shoreline = 61657.5 m. Lake Opinicon is part of the Rideau Canal. To the north is Indian Lake, to the south is Sand Lake, both of which are sources of inflow and outflow. Lake Opinicon also receives inflow from a series of small creeks and two major creeks: Hart Lake Creek and Rock Lake Creek.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.881
Threshold uncertainty score0.236

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0450.033

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBorealis→French-language works237,207→