MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950442821 · doi:10.5284/1099721

Beauchamps, Wyddial, Buntingford, Herts: Archaeological Investigation

2010· article· en· W6950442821 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueArchaeology Data Service · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicEnvironmental Monitoring and Data Management
Canadian institutionsCanadian Heritage
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchaeological evidenceHistoric siteWorld heritageExcavationCultural heritageArchaeological record

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to meet the requirements of an archaeological condition on the planning permission for the construction of a riding arena at Beauchamps, Wyddial, Hertfordshire, the Heritage Network was commissioned by the owner to monitor the groundworks for the development. The site of the outdoor riding arena, which measures 40m by 20m, is located to the south of the moated manorial site at Beauchamps, Wyddial. A planned Victorian farm lies to the north, but cartographic and aerial photographic evidence consulted for the desk-based assessment has shown that this did not extend into the site (Ashworth 2010). The arena lies in an unploughed grassed field, which remained undeveloped since at least the mid 18th century. The archaeological investigation did not encounter any evidence for archaeological features, deposits or finds. The groundworks for the manége did not breach the topsoil, apart from in the south-eastern corner, therefore any underlying archaeological remains are preserved in situ.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.408
Threshold uncertainty score0.811

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchaeology Data ServiceSame topicEnvironmental Monitoring and Data ManagementFrench-language works237,207