MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950442821 · doi:10.5284/1099721

Beauchamps, Wyddial, Buntingford, Herts: Archaeological Investigation

2010· article· en· W6950442821 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueArchaeology Data Service · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicEnvironmental Monitoring and Data Management
Canadian institutionsCanadian Heritage
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchaeological evidenceHistoric siteWorld heritageExcavationCultural heritageArchaeological record

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to meet the requirements of an archaeological condition on the planning permission for the construction of a riding arena at Beauchamps, Wyddial, Hertfordshire, the Heritage Network was commissioned by the owner to monitor the groundworks for the development. The site of the outdoor riding arena, which measures 40m by 20m, is located to the south of the moated manorial site at Beauchamps, Wyddial. A planned Victorian farm lies to the north, but cartographic and aerial photographic evidence consulted for the desk-based assessment has shown that this did not extend into the site (Ashworth 2010). The arena lies in an unploughed grassed field, which remained undeveloped since at least the mid 18th century. The archaeological investigation did not encounter any evidence for archaeological features, deposits or finds. The groundworks for the manége did not breach the topsoil, apart from in the south-eastern corner, therefore any underlying archaeological remains are preserved in situ.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it