Muntiacus putaoensis Amato, Egan & Rabinowitz 1999
Bibliographic record
Abstract
9. Leat Mungac Muntiacus putaoensis French: Muntjac de Putao / German: Burma-Muntjak / Spanish: Muntiaco de Putao Taxonomy. Muntiacus putaoensis Amato, Egan & Rabinowitz, 1999, Atanga, Putao (Myanmar). It belongs to the rooseveltorum species complex. The name comes from its diminutive size, small enough to be wrapped in a leaf of Phrynium. Monotypic. Distribution. NE India and N Myanmar. Descriptive notes. Few measurements available. Shoulder height 40 cm, weight 12 kg. Males and females of equal size. Smallest of the muntjacs, with short pedicles about 3 cm long, tiny unbranched antlers 1-4 cm in length, often hidden by fur. Coat reddishbrown, legs and face slightly darker. The tail is orange-red dorsally. Preorbital fossa relatively large. Females have prominent upper canines. Fawns possibly unspotted. Habitat. Forest-dweller, it has been recorded from 700 m to 1200 m above sea level. Food and Feeding. It feeds on browse and fruit. Stomach contents examined from specimens in Myanmar revealed mainly fruit remains. Breeding. Both pregnant and lactating females have been taken in May, in Myanmar. Activity patterns. Nothing is known, but similar muntjacs are frequently crepuscular, with others both diurnal and nocturnal. Movements, Home range and Social organization. Nothing is known. Status and Conservation. Classified as Data Deficient on The IUCN Red List for the lack of certainty about morphology, taxonomy, distribution, and ecology. Evidence of persistent hunting by local people suggests that numbers may be decreasing. Bibliography. Amato, Egan & Rabinowitz (1999), Amato, Egan & Schaller (2000), Datta et al. (2003), James et al. (2008), Rabinowitz et al. (1999), Timmins, Duckwork & Zaw (2008b).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.031 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".