MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950521238 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.8322332

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) tegulariforme

2023· article· en· W6950521238 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFern and Epiphyte Biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHalictidaeMargin (machine learning)DorsumLine (geometry)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) tegulariforme (Crawford, 1907) Figs 73–75, 76P, 88B, 90A, 93A, 108A, 109A Halictus (Chloralictus) tegulariformis Crawford, 1907: 194 (holotype, ♀, deposited in USNM, examined). Halictus tegulariformis – Cockerell 1916: 77 (comparative notes to helianthi). Halictus (Chloralictus) tegulariformis – Ellis 1914: 101 (comparison to jamaicae = gemmatum). — Sandhouse 1924: 2, 7 (key to species), 11 (comparison to ellisiae). Lasioglossum (Chloralictus) tegulariforme – Michener 1951: 1118 (catalogue). Dialictus tegulariformis – Hurd 1979: 1972 (catalogue). — Moure & Hurd 1987: 133 (catalogue). Diagnosis Females of L. tegulariforme have the tegula very large (maximum length more than half ITS and clearly exceeding posterior margin of mesoscutum in dorsal view), with inner posterior margin strongly concave, and densely punctate (IS <1 PD); T1 disc with an impunctate median line about 1 OD wide; paraocular area punctures similar in size and density to frons punctures; mesoscutum completely dull, tessellate, and finely and densely punctate (IS ≤ 1 PD with 4–5 punctures between posterior end of parapsidal line and lateral edge of mesoscutum); T1 anterior slope usually somewhat shiny with weak microsculpture; and T3 usually with a dense and complete subapical band of tomentum. Females of L. tegulariforme are most similar to those of L. angelicum sp. nov., L. gaudiale, and L. helianthi, all of which have the T1 disc uniformly punctate, paraocular punctures distinctly larger and sparser than frons punctures, and T3 lacking a complete subapical band of tomentum. Females of L. gaudiale (and most L. angelicum) also have the mesoscutum more sparsely punctate (IS = 1–2 PD and 2–3 punctures between posterior end of parapsidal line and lateral edge of mesoscutum) and often shiny. Females of L. helianthi have the tegula smaller (maximum length half or less ITS and not exceeding posterior margin of mesoscutum in dorsal view). Males of L. tegulariforme have the tegula large (as in the female); mesoscutum tessellate and densely punctate (IS ≤ 1 PD); metapostnotum shiny with strong rugae; disc of T1 finely, sparsely punctate medially (IS = 1–3 PD), contrasting with the more densely punctate disc of T2 (IS = 1–2 PD); and T1–T2 apical rims impunctate. Males of L. tegulariforme are most similar to those of L. angelicum sp. nov. and L. helianthi, both of which have the T1–T2 discs uniformly moderately densely to sparsely punctate (IS = 1–2 PD) with some punctures extending onto apical rims. In addition, males of L. angelicum have the mesoscutum usually more sparsely punctate (IS = 1–2 PD), and males of L. helianthi have the tegula smaller (not exceeding posterior margin of mesoscutum in dorsal view). Etymology Crawford (1907) formed the specific epithet ʻ tegulariformis ʼ from the specific epithet ʻ tegularis ʼ plus the Latin noun ʻ forma ʼ (shape, figure) and the adjectival suffix ʻ -is ʼ (pertaining to, having the nature of). It refers to the similarity of this species to L. tegulare. Material examined Holotype UNITED STATES – Nevada • ♀; Ormsby Co.; [39.2° N, 119.8° W]; 6 Jul.; Baker leg.; USNM. Other material CANADA – British Columbia • 1 ♀; Okanagan-Similkameen Reg. Dist., Osoyoos, Rd. 22, Okanagan R.; 49.0895° N, 119.5358° W; elev. 280 m; 22 Apr. 2009; L. R. Best leg.; PCYU. UNITED STATES – California • 1 ♀; Contra Costa Co., San Pablo; [37.96° N, 122.35° W]; 6 Jun. 1931; E.P. Van Duzee leg.; CAS • 1 ♀; Los Angeles Co., Chatsworth; 34.26° N, 118.601° W; 1–8 Jul. 2017; LACM • 1 ♀; Merced Co., Dos Palos; [36.99° N, 120.63° W]; 6 Sep. 1949; J.E. Gillaspy leg.; TAMU-ENTO X1389007 • 1 ♀; San Mateo Co., Redwood City; [37.48° N, 122.23° W]; 13 Sep. 1952; P.H. Arnaud leg.; ex Foeniculum vulgare; CAS • 1 ♂; Yolo Co., CLBL; 38.52395° N, 121.91851° W; elev. 28.35 m; “Summer 2006”; T. Shih, M. VanDyke leg.; ex Origanum sp. “ Marjoram ”; WRME • 1 ♀; Yolo Co., Hermle 3; 38.765384° N, 121.796119° W; 6 Jul. 2016; A. Buderi leg.; ex Polygonum aviculare; UCDC FORB201662412 • 1 ♀; Yolo Co., Hermle SR3; 38.7457° N, 121.7657° W; 7 Jul. 2016; O. Lundin leg.; UCDC FORB201686092 • 1 ♀; Yolo Co., Johnston A; 38.782453° N, 121.790404° W; 23 May 2016; A. Buderi leg.; ex Anthemis cotula; UCDC FORB201661310 • 3 ♀♀; ibid.; 5 Jul. 2016; A. Buderi leg.; ex Hirschfeldia incana; UCDC FORB201662280, FORB201662279, FORB201662221 • 2 ♀♀; ibid.; 29 Jul. 2016; R. Deleray leg.; ex Hirschfeldia incana; UCDC FORB201662630, FORB201662626 • 1 ♀; Yolo Co., Russell Ranch A; 38.542148° N, 121.869337° W; 30 Jun. 2016; R. Deleray leg.; ex Convolvulus arvensis; UCDC FORB201662118 • 6 ♀♀; Yolo Co., Russell Ranch SR3; 38.5423° N, 121.8855° W; 26 Jul. 2016; O. Lundin leg.; UCDC FORB201685695, FORB201685690, FORB201685751, FORB201685793, FORB201685700, FORB201685689 • 1 ♂; Yolo Co., Student Farm 1A; 38.5399° N, 121.766° W; 16 Aug. 2011; N.S.L. Pope leg.; ex Phacelia californica; WRME FORB201103273 • 1 ♀; Yolo Co., Turk 10W/S; 38.574631° N, 121.952068° W; 6 Jun. 2016; A. Buderi leg.; ex Eschscholzia californica; UCDC FORB201661556 • 1 ♀; Yolo Co., Turk 10W/S; 38.576708° N, 121.946151° W; 29 Jun. 2016; R. Deleray leg.; ex Convolvulus arvensis; UCDC FORB201662039 • 1 ♀; Yolo Co., Turk 10W/S; 38.574631° N, 121.952068° W; 29 Jun. 2016; R. Deleray leg.; ex Malva nicaeensis; UCDC FORB201662066 • 1 ♀; Yolo Co., Turk 10W/S; 38.576708° N, 121.946151° W; 29 Jun. 2016; R. Deleray leg.; ex Polygonum aviculare; UCDC FORB201662051 • 1 ♀; ibid.; 25 Aug. 2016; S. Cibotti leg.; ex “ Physalis lancifolia ”; UCDC FORB201663575 • 1 ♀; Yolo Co., Turk 54 SR2; 38.6131° N, 121.9665° W; 12 Jul. 2016; O. Lundin leg.; UCDC FORB201685452 • 1 ♀; Yolo Co., Turk 6S; 38.576639° N, 121.937155° W; 18 Mar. 2016; R. Deleray leg.; ex Phacelia ciliata; UCDC FORB201660028 • 2 ♀♀; Yolo Co., Turk 6S; 38.5795° N, 121.9389° W; 20 Jul. 2016; A. Buderi leg.; ex Solanum americanum; UCDC FORB201663367, FORB201663366 • 1 ♀; ibid.; 24 Aug. 2016; S. Cibotti leg.; ex “ Physalis lancifolia ”; UCDC FORB201664451 • 1 ♀; Yolo Co.; 38.5775° N, 121.8297° W; 19 Jun. 2008; K. Ullmann leg.; ex Lepidium latifolium; WRME M2008SR2 Barger _016 • 1 ♀; Holt; [37.93° N, 121.43° W]; 7 Aug. 1948; W.F. Chamberlain leg.; TAMU-ENTO X1388805. – Idaho • 1 ♀; Boundary Co., Kootenai National Wildlife Refuge; 48.7347° N, 116.3965° W; 8 Jul. 2010; Jan Rose leg.; FWSE • 1 ♀; ibid.; 9 Aug. 2010; Jan Rose leg.; FWSE • 2 ♀♀; Canyon Co., Deer Flat National Wildlife Refuge; 43.55281° N, 116.64137° W; 4 Oct. 2012; Addison Mohler leg.; FWSE • 2 ♀♀; Canyon Co., Deer Flat National Wildlife Refuge, DFS; 43.55281° N, 116.64137° W; 5–6 Jul. 2012; Sabrina Seidel leg.; FWSE • 3 ♀♀; Gooding Co., Wood R. 1 mi. NE Gooding; [42.95° N, 114.7° W]; 6–7 Jul. 1980; M.S. and K.M. Wasbauer leg.; CUIC. – Nevada • 1 ♂; Fallon; [39.47° N, 118.78° W]; 12 Aug. 1940; L.C. Kuitert leg.; SEMC. – Oregon • 9 ♀♀; Harney Co., Malheur National Wildlife Refuge; 42.8277° N, 118.8874° W; 14 Jul. 2010; Linda Beck leg.; FWSE • 1 ♀; Harney Co., Malheur National Wildlife Refuge; 43.2635° N, 118.8421° W; 20 May 2011; Tami Coe leg.; FWSE • 4 ♀♀; Harney Co., Malheur NWR; 43.2652° N, 118.8433° W; 8 Jul. 2010; Linda Beck leg.; FWSE • 5 ♀♀; Multnomah Co., Government Island Habitat Restoration Project; 45.58233° N, 122.53719° W; 11 May 2016; M. Blackburn, R. Hatfield leg.; FWSE • 1 ♀; ibid.; 21 Jul. 2016; M. Blackburn, K. Hietala-Henschell leg.; FWSE • 1 ♀; ibid.; 25 May 2017; M. Blackburn, R. Hatfield leg.; FWSE • 1 ♀; ibid.; 22 Jun. 2017; M. Blackburn, K. Hietala-Henschell leg.; FWSE • 1 ♀; ibid.; 26 Jul. 2017; M. Blackburn, K. Hietala-Henschell leg.; FWSE. – Washington • 4 ♀♀; Stevens Co., Little Pend Oreille National Wildlife Refuge; 48.4654° N, 117.7358° W; 23–24 Aug. 2011; Mike Munts leg.; FWSE. Range Cascadia bioregion, northern Great Basin, and California (Fig. 75). Floral hosts APIACEAE: Foeniculum: F. vulgare • ASTERACEAE: Anthemis: A. cotula L. • BORAGINACEAE: Phacelia: P. californica Cham. • P. ciliata • BRASSICACEAE: Hirschfeldia: H. incana (L.) Lagr.-Foss. • Lepidium: L. latifolium L. • CONVOLVULACEAE: Convolvulus L.: C. arvensis L. • LAMIACEAE: Origanum L. • MALVACEAE: Malva L.: M. nicaeensis All. • PAPAVERACEAE: Eschscholzia: E. californica • POLYGONACEAE: Polygonum: P. aviculare L. • SOLANACEAE: Physalis • Solanum: S. americanum Mill. DNA barcodes Three confirmed sequences available (BOLD process IDs: BCLRB752-10, DLIII111-18, DLIII112-18). There is a small amount of divergence within these sequences (0.31% maximum intraspecific p-distance). They are closest in terms of p-distance to L. deludens sp. nov. (2.17% minimum interspecific p-distance). Two fixed nucleotide substitutions distinguish L. tegulariforme from all other Nearctic species of the L. gemmatum complex: 183(T) and 570(C) (Supp. file 2).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.559
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.028

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicFern and Epiphyte BiologyFrench-language works237,207