Parmelia barrenoae Divakar, M. C. Molina & A. Crespo, Lichenologist
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Parmelia barrenoae Divakar, M.C. Molina & A. Crespo, Lichenologist 37(1): 43 (2005). Fig. 3 Type:— SPAIN. ÁVILA: Sierra de Gredos, Navalpera de Tormes, Cruz del Gallo, 1300 m, on Quercus pyrenaica, 6 Sept. 2003, A. Crespo (holotype MAF 9906; isotypes BM, GZU, UPS). Lobes short and broad, overlapping, 2–7 mm wide; rhizines simple to furcate; soralia laminal, rapidly releasing soredia, leaving the exposed, light medulla. Atranorin, salazinic and consalazinic acids always present (Divakar et al. 2005; Hodkinson et al. 2010). In addition to the mostly laminal soralia, it also differs from P. asiatica and P. sulcata, in its simple to furcate rhizines (Table 1). The species seems to be common in the western USA (Hodkinson et al. 2010), but it had not been previously reported in the central states (South Dakota and Illinois), nor from Canada. Material examined. CANADA. Ontario: Ottawa (metro), 28 Benson Street, 45°21’N, 75°43’W, garden in back, on rotting picnic table, on picnic bench, 15 June 2005, I. M. Brodo 31715B (CANL 120652). USA. South Dakota: Custer County: Cicero Peak (6.5 miles south of Custer), on south side of peak, saxicolous, 7 July 1960, C. M. Wetmore 6991 (MSC 23989); Pennington County, valley on south side near top of Harney Peak, 7 miles northeast of Custer, corticolous, 10 July 1960, C. M. Wetmore 7278 (MSC 23944); Illinois: Lake County, north of Highway 20, red rocks area, above Grizzly Canyon near radio facility, about 34 miles west-southwest of the town of Williams, on twigs and branches of Quercus, 29 July 2011, C. R. Björk 23702 (UBC-L 52130); Washington: Spokane, Dishman Hills county park, on ridge near the southern tip of the park, 47°39’N, 117°17’W, branches Populus tremuloides near sylvan pool in open, dry conifer forest on rocky ridge, 07 April 2011, C. R. Björk 22305 (UBC L-47428); Riverside State Park, edge of the Channeled Scablands, slopes above the “Bowl & Pitcher”, along trail below the parking lot of the main overlook, 47°42’N, 117°30’W, twigs of Amelanchier at top of basalt cliff, 03 Apr. 2011, C. R. Björk 22206 (UBC L-47419).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.058 | 0.022 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".