MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950531182 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7521989

Malus coronaria Mill.

2022· article· en· W6950531182 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMalusPEARPyrus communisRosaceaeFruit tree

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

22. Malus coronaria (L.) Mill. Figs 51–52 Gardeners Dictionary, 8 th Ed.: Malus no. 2 (Miller 1768). Pyrus coronaria L., Species Plantarum Vol. 1: 480 (Linnaeus 1753). – Type: COUNTRY UNKNOWN • s.d.; Linnaeus s.n.; holotype: LINN [LINN-HL647-5]! Malus bracteata Rehder, Trees & Shrubs Vol. 2 (4): 230 (Rehder 1913b). – Pyrus bracteata L.H.Bailey, Rhodora 18: 154 (Bailey 1916a). – Malus coronaria var. bracteata (Rehder) Likhonos, Kul’turnaya Flora SSSR Vol. 14: 34 (Likhonos 1983). – Type: USA • Campbell, Dunklin County; 22 Apr. 1912; fl; B.F. Bush 6631A; lectotype: A [A00026590]!, here designated; isolectotype: A [00026588]!, GH [GH00026589]! Malus coronaria var. dasycalyx Rehder, Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 2 (1): 52–53 (Rehder 1920). – Pyrus coronaria var. dasycalyx (Rehder) Fernald, Rhodora 49: 232 (Fernald 1947). – Type: USA • Ohio Toledo, Maumee River bank, Walbridge Park; 28 Sep. 1914; fr; R.E. Horsey 253; lectotype: A [A00026594]!, here designated; isolectotype: A [A00026593, A00026595]! Malus coronaria var. dasycalyx f. charlottae Rehder, Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 2 (1): 53 (Rehder 1920). – Type: USA • Illinois, Waukegan; 1 Jun. 1919; fl; E.P. Dewolf s.n.; lectotype: A [A00026591]!, here designated. Malus coronaria var. hoopesii Rehder, Trees & Shrubs Vol. 2 (3): 142 (Rehder 1911b). – Malus platycarpa var. hoopesii (Rehder) Rehder, Trees & Shrubs Vol. 2 (4): 227 (Rehder 1913b). – Pyrus platycarpa var. hoopesii L.H.Bailey, Rhodora 18: 154 (Bailey 1916a). – Type: USA • Massachussetts, Boston, Jamaica Plain, cultivated at the Arnold Arboretum; 9 Oct. 1903; fr; Anonymous s.n.; lectotype: A [00026634]!, here designated. Malus coronaria var. puberula Rehder, Trees & Shrubs Vol. 2 (4): 229‒230 (Rehder 1913b). – Malus angustifolia var. puberula (Rehder) Rehder, Mitteilungen der deutschen dendrologischen Gesellschaft 23: 261 (Rehder 1914). – Pyrus angustifolia var. puberula (Rehder) L.H.Bailey, Rhodora 18: 154 (Bailey 1916a). – Type: USA • Louisiana, Winnfield, Winn Parish; 6 Apr. 1913; fl; C.S. Sargent s.n.; lectotype: A [A00026579]!, here designated; isolectotype: A [A00026580]! Malus fragrans Rehder, Trees & Shrubs Vol. 2 (4): 228 (Rehder 1913b). – Type: USA • New York, Ontario County, Canandaigua; 19 May 1911; fl.; B.H. Slavin 2; lectotype: A [A01861241]!, here designated; isolectotype: A[A01861269]! Malus fragrans var. elongata Rehder, Trees & Shrubs Vol. 2 (4): 229 (Rehder 1913b). – Pyrus elongata (Rehder) Ashe, Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society 34 (3): 139 (Ashe 1918b), nom. nud. – Malus elongata (Rehder) Ashe, Bulletin of the Charleston Museum 12 (5): 38 (Ashe 1916). – Malus coronaria var. elongata (Rehder) Rehder, Mitteilungen der deutschen dendrologischen Gesellschaft 23: 261 (Rehder 1914). – Pyrus coronaria var. elongata L.H.Bailey, Rhodora 18: 154 (Bailey 1916a). – Type: USA • North Carolina, Highlands, Macon County, Highlands; 20 May 1911; fl; T.G. Harbison 625; holotype: NCU [NCU00043395]!; isotype: A [A00026601, A00026602]! Malus glabrata Rehder, Trees & Shrubs Vol. 2 (4): 225, tab. 188 (Rehder 1913a). – Malus coronaria var. glabrata (Rehder) Likhonos, Kul’turnaya Flora SSSR Vol. 14: 33 (Likhonos 1983). – Type: USA • North Carolina, Buncombe; 29 Apr. 1911; fl; T.G. Harbison 522; holotype: NCU [NCU00043536]!; isotype: A [A00026603, A00026604]!, NCU [NCU00043537]! Malus glaucescens Rehder, Trees & Shrubs Vol. 2 (3): 139, tab. 187 (Rehder 1911a). – Malus coronaria var. glaucescens (Rehder) Likhonos, Kul’turnaya Flora SSSR Vol. 14: 33 (Likhonos 1983). – Type: USA • New York, Rochester, Maple Grove Park; 25 May 1904 and 1905; fl; J. Dunbar s.n.; type: A, designated by Rehder 1913: 139. Malus lancifolia Rehder, Trees & Shrubs Vol. 2 (3): 141, t. 157 (Rehder 1911b). – Pyrus coronaria var. lancifolia (Rehder) Fernald, Rhodora 49: 232 (Fernald 1947). – Malus coronaria var. lancifolia (Rehder) C.F.Reed, Phytologia 63 (5): 410 (Reed 1987). – Type: USA • Missouri, Jackson, Courtney; 29 Apr. 1906; B.F. Bush 3869; lectotype: A [A00026630]!, here designated; isolectotype: GH [GH00026631]!, NY [NY01163660]! Malus platycarpa Rehder, Trees & Shrubs Vol. 2 (4): 227, pl. 189 (Rehder 1913b). – Pyrus platycarpa L.H.Bailey, Rhodora 18: 154 (Bailey 1916a). – Malus coronaria var. platycarpa (Rehder) Likhonos, Kul’turnaya Flora SSSR Vol. 14: 33 (Likhonos 1983). – Type: USA • North Carolina, Macon County, Franklin, Tennessee Valley; 22 Apr. 1911; fl; T.G. Harbison 503; type: A [A00026632, A00026633]! – Malus platycarpa var. parvula Ashe, Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 49 (9): 268 (Ashe 1922). – Type: USA • Georgia, Habersham County; Oct. 1913; W.W. A s.n.; herbarium unknown. Pyrus carolinensis Ashe, Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society 34 (3): 138 (Ashe 1918b). – Malus carolinensis Ashe, Bulletin of the Charleston Museum 14 (2): 10 (Ashe 1918a). – Type: USA • North Carolina, Transilvana County, Mills River; 26 Sep. 1917; st; W.W. Ashe 60; lectotype: NY [NY01163662]!, here designated; isolectotype: NCU [NCU00000344, NCU00000345]! Examined specimens UNITED STATES – Alabama • Valleyhead; 11 Oct. 1911; st; T.G. Harbison s.n.; A • Piedmont; 1 Nov. 1941; st; C. Dorman s.n.; A. – Delaware • New Castle; 15 May 1937; fl; R.R. Tatnall 3296; GH • near Stanton; 13 May 1897; fl; Anonymous s.n.; A [01861073]. – Georgia • Rabun; 2 Jun. 1916; st; T.G. Harbison H1228; A. – Illinois • Waukegan; 22 Jun. 1920; fl; E.P. Dewolf s.n.; A. – Kentucky • Olympia Spring; 11 Sep. 1913; st; C.S. Sargent s.n.; A. – Louisiana • near Winnfield; 6 Apr.; fl; C.S. Sargent s.n.; A. – Michigan • Oakland; 2 Jun. 1931; fl; O.A. Farwell 8877; GH. – New York • Ontario; 20 Sep. 1990; fr; Professor Zhen-Long Yan 1067; PE. – North Carolina • Clay; 18 May 1980; fl; D.E. Boufford et al. 22098; HHBG, PE, SZ. – Ohio • Lorain; 13 May and 14 Aug. 1913; fl, fr; F.O. Grover s.n.; NAS • Fairfield; 24 Sep. 1914; st; R.E. Horsey 223; A • Mahoning; 27 May 1917; fl; R.E. Horsey 631; A. – Pennsylvania • Stromberg; 22 May; fl; C.S. Sargent s.n.; A [01861497]. – Virginia • Tip Top; 25 May 1914; fl; T.C. Harbison 1615; A. Description Small tree or shrub, 5‒10 m high. Branches terete, pubescent when young, glabrescent. Leaves petiolate, petiole ca 1.6‒2.3 cm long, puberulous or glabrous. Lamina ca 4.6‒5.6 × 2.8‒3.5 cm, oblong to ovate, base cordate, rounded or cuneate, equilateral, apex acute, rounded or obtuse, margin biserrate or entire, blade glabrous or puberulous, sometimes lobed. Inflorescence corymbose, with 4‒6 flowers. Pedicel ca 2.0‒ 3.3 cm long, crinite or glabrous. Hypanthium puberulous or glabrous. Sepals triangular, abaxially glabrous or puberulous, adaxially densely puberulous, persistent. Petals ca 1.2‒1.9 × 0.7‒1.3 cm, white, pink or premium pink, obovate to oblong. Stamens ca 20, unequal, with pink or purple anther. Styles 5, as long as or longer than stamens, pubescent at base. Pome ca 2.5‒3.5 cm in diameter, subglobose, yellow. Carpopodium ca 1.2‒4.0 cm long, puberulous or glabrous. Phenology Flowers from April to June. Mature fruits from September to November. Habitat Terrestrial, seasonally green, growing in forests and shrubs in open areas of valleys, beside streams or roadsides; 50‒1000 m a.s.l. Distribution United States (Fig. 51). Chromosome numbers 2n = 34, 51, 68.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.158
Threshold uncertainty score0.528

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1580.103

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicBotany, Ecology, and Taxonomy StudiesFrench-language works237,207