MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950549583 · doi:10.5284/1099528

Great Barn, Rectory Farm, Pirton, Hertfordshire

2012· article· en· W6950549583 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueArchaeology Data Service · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Architecture and Urbanism
Canadian institutionsCanadian Heritage
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBarnCopyingThursdayBrick

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As part of an application for listed building consent and planning consent for the development of the Great Barn, Rectory Farm, Shillington Road, Pirton, Herts, the Heritage Network was commissioned by the developers to create a record of the building in its present state. The Great Barn was built as a tithe barn in the 15th or early 16th century. It has remained in use as an agricultural barn until recent years. It is a 10-bay structure, measuring approximately 10m in width, 40m in length and 10m in height. The barn has undergone a number of changes over the centuries, including the replacement of the original wattle and daub panelling with brick noggin and the replacement of the thatched roof with ceramic tiles. The rebuilding of much of the east elevation and the replacement internal framing on the east side suggests that this side was subject to more rapid decay, possibly as a result of prevailing weather patterns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.871
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it