MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950570930 · doi:10.5683/sp3/uwpztv

DQ11 [Decima Quarterly 11 September 1982]

2023· dataset· en· W6950570930 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueBorealis · 2023
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsOccupational Cancer Research Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Sample (material)Survey researchSurvey samplingSurvey methodologySurvey data collection

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Decima Quarterly is a survey of public attitudes of Canadians on a wide range of matters related to public affairs, which was conducted every three months from the first quarter of 1980 until the first quarter of 1995. Each survey involves interviews of some 150+ questions with a random sample size of 1,500 Canadian citizens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.888
Threshold uncertainty score0.226

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.018
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0550.054

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBorealisFrench-language works237,207