Stenus pertenuis Puthz 2012, nov.sp.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stenus pertenuis nov.sp. (Figs 41, 75) Type material: Holotype () and 2, 3 - paratypes: Taiwan: Kaohsiung Hsien: Creek 2 km E Tien Chih, Hwy 20, 2400m, 22.VII.1993, A. Smetana (T 161). Paratypes: 1: Kuanshan Trail above Kaunshanchi River, 2550m, 22.VII.1993, idem (T 160).- HT and PTT in coll. Smetana (Ottawa), PTT also in cP. Description: About as in S. persubtilis nov.sp. Length: 2.9-3.4mm (forebody: 1.5-1.6mm). PM of the HT: HW: 31; DE: 16; PW: 22.5; PL: 23; EW: 27; EL: 25; SL: 19.5. Male: Metasternum distinctly impressed, coarsely and densely punctate, interstices smaller than half diameter of punctures. Anterior sternites simple, sternite 7 finely and densely punctate and pubescent medially. Sternite 8 with a shallow, moderately broad apical emargination (LS: ED= 54:3). Sternite 9 with moderately long blackish apicolateral teeth. Aedeagus (fig. 41), apical portion of median lobe very broadly rounded ventrally, with a short triangular apex dorsally, expulsion hooks separated; parameres distinctly longer than median lobe, with about 8 apical setae. Female: Sternite 8 obtusely angled triangular at posterior margin, apex rounded. Valvifer with a comparatively short apicolateral tooth. Spermatheca (fig. 75), infundibulum at least 4x as long as broad. Median portion of frons distinctly exceeding the level of medial eye margins; elytra very uneven with deep longitudinal impressions, punctation coarser than in S. persubtilis, largest punctures as large as medial cross section of antennal segment 2; abdominal punctation dense, interstices on tergite 7 smaller than punctures. Comparative note: This species has to be identified best by the sexual characters; see also key. Etymology: Because of the small body I name this species " pertenuis " (Lat.= very small).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".