MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950648523 · doi:10.5284/1097012

The Ridgewood Cenre, Old Bisley Road, Frimley, Surrey - Historic Building Record

2015· article· en· W6950648523 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArchaeology Data Service · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemolitionRedevelopmentLandscapingAmenityWork (physics)ArchitectureAlleyNova scotia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In March 2015 Archaeology South-East (a division of the Centre for Applied Archaeology, University College London) carried out a programme of historic building recording in connection with the development of The Ridgewood Centre, Old Bisley Road, Frimley, Surrey, GU16 9QE (hereafter 'the site'; centred NGR: 490482 159213). The work was commissioned by CgMs Consulting to satisfy conditions attached to planning permission (planning ref: 14/0800) for the redevelopment of the site comprising part demolition/part conversion of the existing buildings on the site in preparation for the construction of 100 residential dwellings (comprising 9 one bed, 27 two bed, 49 three bed, 11 four bed and 4 five bed units) with associated parking facilities, access roads, landscaping and amenity spaces. The Ridgewood Centre comprises c. 15 buildings, including the central Edwardian structure (Building 1) of the former Brompton Hospital Sanatorium with three projecting ward blocks (Buildings 2-4), and a group of ancillary buildings (Buildings 5-11) comprising a kitchen block, assembly hall, dining blocks, nurses' house and the medical officer's house. The proposed development includes the retention of the main central block (comprising Buildings 1-4) and associated sunken garden, with the demolition of the remainder of the buildings on the site. The purpose of this recording exercise will create a record of Buildings 5-11 as existing prior to their demolition (identified on Fig. 2). Buildings 5-10 have a construction date of 1904 with two additional phases of development; Building 5 was significantly extended between 1935 and 1968 and Building 11 (comprising an extension to Building 10) was built by 1928. This report complements an Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment (CgMs Consulting, August 2014) and Heritage Impact Assessment (Asset Heritage Consulting, August 2014) previously produced for this scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.644
Threshold uncertainty score0.716

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0660.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchaeology Data ServiceSame topicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesFrench-language works237,207