MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950650700 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7837973

The International Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) Cluster of Challenges

2023· other· en· W6950650700 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPrecipitation Measurement and Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalUniversity of TorontoLondon Health Sciences CentreKingston General HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBenchmarkingGeneralizability theorySegmentationGround truthPopulationMissing dataFocus (optics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The International Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenge. BraTS, since 2012, has focused on the generation of a benchmarking environment and dataset for the delineation of adult brain gliomas. The focus of this year’s challenge remains the generation of a common benchmarking environment, but its dataset is substantially expanded to ~4,500 cases towards addressing additional i) populations (e.g., sub-Saharan Africa patients), ii) tumors (e.g., meningioma), iii) clinical concerns (e.g., missing data), and iv) technical considerations (e.g., augmentations). Specifically, the focus of BraTS 2023 is to identify the current state-of-the-art algorithms for addressing (Task 1) the same adult glioma population as in the RSNA-ANSR-MICCAI BraTS challenge, as well as (Task 2) the underserved sub-Saharan African brain glioma patient population, (Task 3) intracranial meningioma, (Task 4) brain metastasis, (Task 5) pediatric brain tumor patients, (Task 6) global & local missing data, (Task 7) useful augmentation techniques, and importantly (Task 8) the algorithmic generalizability across Tasks 1-5. Details for each ‘Task’ are listed in the rest of this documents. Notably, all data are routine clinically-acquired, multi-site multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) scans of brain tumor patients. The BraTS 2023 challenge participants are able to obtain the training and validation data of the challenge at any point from the Synapse platform. These data will be used to develop, containerize, and evaluate their algorithms in unseen validation data until August 2023, when the organizers will stop accepting new submissions and evaluate the submitted algorithms in the hidden testing data. Ground truth reference annotations for all datasets are created and approved by expert neuroradiologists for every subject included in the training, validation, and testing datasets to quantitatively evaluate the performance of the participating algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.004
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0070.009
Research integrity0.0060.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicPrecipitation Measurement and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207