Bibliographic record
Abstract
Scatopsciara atomaria (Zetterstedt, 1851) (Fig. 17 A–D) Sciara atomaria Zetterstedt, 1851 [Zetterstedt (1851): 3761–3762] Common synonym: Scatopsciara vivida (winnertz, 1867) Literature: Lengersdorf (1928 –1930): 58, plate 4, fig. 87 (as Lycoria vivida). Frey (1948): 70, 87, plate 20, fig. 120; Tuomikoski (1960): 151–153 (all as Scaptosciara vivida); Menzel & Mohrig (2000): 494–496, figs 458–463; Mohrig et al. (2013): 235–237. Material studied: 1 male, 1.xi.2007, Australia, Sydney, biosecurity intercept (Bottle 130376), on Paeonia plants ex Canada, leg. M. Coleman (PABM). Diagnostic remarks. The species is characterised by sparse hairs on the flagellomeres, with a few stronger spear-like bristles among the hairs; short 3-segmented palpi with a sensory pit on the basal segment; wings with a very short R1; apex of the hind tibia with only one spur; and the gonostylus short and curved, with a long apical tooth and 3–5 somewhat shorter subapical spines. Economic importance. A ubiquitous and common species, particularly in areas of anthropogenic influence (Mohrig et al. 2013), but not known to be a pest. Distribution. Holarctic. Also distributed in Central America.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".