HODI Award in Built Heritage Conservation (2022)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Carleton Announces Student results of the HODI Award in Built Heritage Conservation Carleton University and the Board of Directors of Historic Ottawa Development Inc. (HODI) have announced the winners results of the 2022 HODI Award in Built Heritage Conservation. This is the sixth annual competition since the first HODI competition in 2016. This year there were six undergraduate entrants from the Conservation and Sustainability program and one graduate entrant, all from the Azrieli School of Architecture and Urbanism. The efforts put forth by all the students were appreciated, but none fully met the competition criteria to give out a first-place award. The jury members have decided to give only one award of honorable mention and one merit award to recognize submissions that came closer to meeting the criteria of the competition. Some cash would be awarded, with the remainder ($5250) held for the next competition. One graduate student received an award of honorable mention: Danielle Myronyk for her thesis project ‘Saving Architectural Heritage MapleLawn Estate and Garden’ One team of undergraduate students received an Award of Merit: Madison Leonard and Dylan Jozkow (3rd year) – ‘Kemp Farmstead’
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.105 | 0.132 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".