Freshwater Zooplankton Species of Newfoundland and Labrador
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Checklist of freshwater zooplankton SPECIES of Class Branchiopoda and Class Maxillopoda, SubClass Copepoda (all Subphylum Crustacea) of insular Newfoundland and in Labrador, based on literature search and the researcher's collections. Prepared for the Provincial Species Status Advisory Committee SSAC by Dr. Christine Campbell. For Branchiopoda: Classification based on Dodson and Frey (2001). Other classifications list Cladocera as one Order with Anomopoda, Ctenopoda, Onychopoda and Haplopoda as Suborders (Crease and Taylor 1998). Distribution of littoral species is not well-known in the province, as littoral habitats have not been as extensively sampled as pelagic. For Copepoda: Classification based on Williamson and Reid (2001). Genus nomenclature follows Dussart and Defaye (2002) for calanoids and Hudson et al. (1998) for cyclopoids. Other classifications list Crustacea as Class, with Copepoda as Subclass (Great Lakes Science Center webpage). Data on provincial distributions and abundance are more available for Calanoida (primarily pelagic species) than for Cyclopoida (pelagic/littoral species), while little is known about Harpacticoida (small, littoral species). Littoral habitats have not been as extensively sampled as pelagic. Given as pdf and Word documents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.022 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".