MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950696933 · doi:10.5282/rcc/7702

Coal in the Age of the Oil Sands

2017· article· en· W6950696933 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversitätsbibliothek der LMU · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOil sandsCoalLand reclamationPoliticsGovernment (linguistics)WonderResource (disambiguation)The Renaissance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While Alberta’s oil sands are the focus of much scholarly and political attention, coal, as Piper argues in this article, has also played an important role in the Canadian province’s history. Once essential to Alberta’s economy, the coal industry declined in the post-World War Two period, rebounding by the early 1970s thanks to government support. This renaissance coincided with the emergence of a new environmentalist consciousness in Alberta, in part focused on the effects of strip mining for coal. Tensions between capitalist growth and environmental protection played out in public hearings on resource development, whose outcomes focused on land reclamation to the exclusion of regulating other harmful aspects of coal mining—thereby enabling continued development and ecological harm. However, new political and economic circumstances suggest that there is reason to wonder if this may change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.837
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversitätsbibliothek der LMUSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207