MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950711368 · doi:10.5284/1124694

75 Head Street, Halstead, Essex. CO9 2AU. Historic building recording and analysis of the outbuilding. Recorded 05 11 2021.

2022· article· en· W6950711368 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArchaeology Data Service · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Architecture and Urbanism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrickworkRoofHead (geology)TOPSFrame (networking)Quarter (Canadian coin)Steel frame

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

75 Head Street, Halstead, Essex. CO9 2AU. Historic building recording and analysis of the outbuilding. Recorded 05 11 2021. Notwithstanding the machined timber joists and Victorian brickwork the building does not appear on mapping until between 1855 and 1876. By 1876 it is shown as part of a complex of buildings that surrounded it on all sides. Although it has the format of a stables with hayloft above, there is no apparent access for horses other than through a covered shelter shown open to the lane at the north. It was therefore most likely used as storage and workrooms for the adjacent tenements. The building has been renovated with LC20th weatherboards and a doorway blocked with Celcon blocks. There are 1990's style timber casements made from ginger woodwork. The upper floor has been recently reboarded and a timber staircase inserted. The upper frame is primary braced a machine cut softwood scantling frame for weatherboards. The roof has circular sawn waney tie-beams and collars that were popular at the time. The rafters are machined softwood but cut as quarter poles on a 4in module.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.819
Threshold uncertainty score0.257

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8190.552

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchaeology Data ServiceSame topicHistorical Architecture and UrbanismFrench-language works237,207