MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950723449 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7702991

Una montagna di molecole

2022· article· it· W6950723449 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysics and Gravity Measurements
Canadian institutionsEcomuseum Zoo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExpansiveResearch methodologySocial impactContext (archaeology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dal desiderio di valorizzare le risorse della montagna pistoiese nasce il progetto THEO (utilizzo del timo come fonte di oli essenziali da impiegare nella lotta a microorganismi e agenti infestanti) finanziato dalla Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Pistoia e Pescia con il bando 'Ricerca e innovazione aziendale 2022', con la partecipazione di Cnr, Ecomuseo della Montagna Pistoiese, Azienda Agricola Le Roncacce, e la collaborazione del Museo Naturalistico Archeologico dell'Appennino Pistoiese (MUNAP). Il progetto è incentrato sull’utilizzo del timo (Thymus spp.) come fonte di composti bioattivi ad alto potere antimicrobico per la realizzazione di formulati solidi da impiegare nella conservazione di opere e manufatti museali. “Una montagna di molecole” è un racconto che partendo dall’ascolto storico-documentario prosegue nell’interpretazione di segni ecologici che hanno una relazione con la biodiversità e le risorse del territorio, per trasformarsi in un progetto di ricerca concreto incentrato sull’uso dei derivati delle piante officinali locali. Questo è stato possibile non solo grazie a un prodotto - il timo - e ai suoi derivati, ma anche grazie ad una comunità che lo ha preservato come memoria territoriale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicGeophysics and Gravity MeasurementsFrench-language works237,207