MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950833599 · doi:10.5284/1111074

HN1552 - St Albans, Replacement Bridge (adj to King Harry Lane), Verulamium Park

2021· article· en· W6950833599 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueArchaeology Data Service · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMusic and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsCanadian Heritage
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBridge (graph theory)World heritagePeriod (music)Sampling (signal processing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As part of the Scheduled Monument Consent (SMC ref. S1003515 08042020) for the geotechnical investigation for a replacement footbridge crossing the Verulamium Park dyke, adjacent to King Harry Lane, St Albans, the Heritage Network was commissioned by St Albans District Council to undertake a watching brief of the groundworks. The bridge lies at the southern extent of the scheduled site of Verulamium (SM ref. 1003515), adjacent to King Harry Lane, centred on NGR TL 13607 06519 (Figure 1). An initial investigation was conducted by hand to excavate six test pits, however due to the nature of the ground only one was successful (Test Pit 3), two were later excavated with the aid of a dynamic sampling rig (Window Samples 1, 2 and 3). No archaeological features, deposits or finds were encountered during the course of the investigation and no evidence for activity pre-dating the modern period was noted in TP3, WS1 and WS2. Occasional CBM was found in WS3, possibly dating to the Roman period, although no archaeological features or deposits could be determined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.161
Threshold uncertainty score0.539

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1610.026

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchaeology Data ServiceSame topicMusic and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207