The HAWC Satellite Mission: The Canadian Contribution to NASA AOS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<!--!introduction!--><b></b> The HAWC (High-altitude Aerosols, Water vapour and Clouds) satellite mission is a highly synergistic observing system of three Canadian passive imaging sensors: the Aerosol Limb Imager (ALI) instrument, the Thin Ice Clouds in the Far InfraRed Emissions (TICFIRE), and the Spatial Heterodyne Observations of Water (SHOW) instrument. The mission was confirmed by the federal government as the Canadian contribution to NASA’s Atmospheric Observing System; a satellite constellation that will include multiple satellites with instruments to monitor aerosol, clouds, and precipitation as part of the Earth System Observatory (ESO). The HAWC instruments will work together to obtain vertically resolved measurements of aerosol and water vapour together with nadir measurements of radiation, thin ice cloud content, and cloud microphysical properties. These coordinated measurements will help build a more comprehensive understanding of climate-critical interactions of aerosol, cloud, and water vapour in the atmosphere.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it