MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6955070034 · doi:10.58067/yk79-ap61

Axtion Independence Mobility Inc.: Challenges from Prototype to Market Launch

2024· article· en· W6955070034 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueConestoga College Repository · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBusiness Strategies and Innovation
Canadian institutionsAcadia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProcess (computing)Independence (probability theory)DignityProduct (mathematics)Lift (data mining)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This case addresses some of the distribution, marketing, and pricing challenges posed when developing and launching a new product. McGillivray and Maaskant passionately developed the Ibex Lift with the intention of helping people safely maintain their dignity and independence as they age. The device, a hybrid walker and lift that not only helps to prevent falls but helps a person up after a fall, has benefits for multiple stakeholders. This case provides an opportunity for students to make recommendations on how to communicate the quantitative and qualitative benefits while assessing an appropriate price point to obtain overall financial viability. Students will benefit from this case by understanding that the process of developing a new product often comes with many challenges but by conducting appropriate due diligence, the likelihood of successfully launching the product to market significantly increases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.615
Threshold uncertainty score0.843

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it