Bohème sans frontière / Bohemia Without Borders
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Grâce aux Scènes de la vie de bohème de Murger, à l’opéra de Puccini ou encore à la chanson de Charles Aznavour, nous avons tous une idée, plus ou moins confuse, de ce qu’a été la bohème littéraire et artistique dans les deux derniers siècles. Ce mot appelle toujours, chez le lecteur contemporain, une multitude d’images, de scènes et de personnages types. Marx, Benjamin, Bourdieu et bien d’autres ont eu recours à sa force d’évocation. Et pourtant rares ont été les tentatives pour envisager la bohème dans ses diverses dimensions. Le colloque international « Bohème sans frontière / Bohemia Without Borders » explorera cette question cruciale de l’histoire de la littérature et de la culture tant française qu’espagnole, britannique, canadienne et sud-américaine. Il s’agira d’interroger les modes de constitution, de perpétuation, de représentation, de légitimation de la bohème, ainsi que la diffusion de son imaginaire au-delà des frontières géographiques et culturelles de la France.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".