MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6955265959 · doi:10.58079/pn5c

A lire, Christophe Rioux : « L’art permet d’injecter du Botox aux maisons de luxe », Le Monde, 23.10.2014

2014· article· fr· W6955265959 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicContemporary art, education, critique
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClosure (psychology)Selection (genetic algorithm)Process (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extrait: Vendredi 24 octobre et les deux jours qui suivront, les amateurs d’art contemporain pourront visiter gratuitement la Fondation Louis Vuitton, conçue par l’architecte américano-canadien Frank Gehry, près du Jardin d’acclimatation, à Paris. A compter de lundi 27 octobre, le prix d’entrée (14 euros) permettra de découvrir à la fois les collections de la Fondation et le jardin. Christophe Rioux, directeur du pôle luxe et industries créatives de l’Institut supérieur du commerce de Paris e...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.634
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.032
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0430.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)Same topicContemporary art, education, critiqueFrench-language works237,207