MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6955312222 · doi:10.58067/pytp-3m92

Woodland Supply Information System Project Selection

2023· article· en· W6955312222 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueConestoga College Repository · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSupply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Canadian institutionsConestoga College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWoodlandWork (physics)Information systemSelection (genetic algorithm)Strategic planning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It was early morning November 2, 2020. Kelly Green, IT Manager, Woodland Supply Inc. (Woodland) was preparing for an annual budget meeting in two weeks with the leadership team to present his recommendations on 2021 IT projects for approval. The IT department worked tirelessly to implement systems that would allow Woodland Supply to continue operations under the demands of COVID-19. These IT projects, including e-commerce, business intelligence, call centre, online training platforms, and strategic device deployment, played a major role in Woodlands’ ability to operate, innovate, and even excel during the pandemic. Green must determine how to evaluate the potential IT projects for 2021 in the changing dynamic. He had to act fast, as his annual budget meeting was two weeks away.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.189
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it