MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6955319463 · doi:10.58079/w4ft

Conflits djihadiste et terroriste dans la bande sahélo-saharienne. Acteurs, enjeux et perspectives

2024· other· fr· W6955319463 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrias Culturais (Universidade de Coimbra) · 2024
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)MetisChinatown

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

De 2012 à nos jours, la zone sahélo-saharienne, s’étendant de l’Afrique de l’Ouest à l’Afrique centrale, a été le théâtre de diverses crises, qui ont ainsi mis à feu et à sang cet espace, en le plongeant dans une effroyable situation d’insécurité. Depuis plus d’une décennie, la région du Sahel est déstabilisée tant sur le plan sécuritaire, politico-militaire qu’économique. Cela engendre, de fait, des crises intercommunautaires, scolaires, socio-économiques, etc. La Revue scientifique de l’École de maintien de la Paix-Alioune Blondin Bèye lance son premier numéro thématique portant sur « Les conflits djihadiste et terroriste dans la bande sahélo-saharienne ». La revue accepte des articles originaux sur les thèmes en rapport avec le djihad et le terrorisme dans le Sahel. Les pistes de réflexion abordées sont, entre autres, les causes du conflit, les acteurs, les enjeux, le climat, la démographie, la santé, la résilience des populations et les accords concernant l’espace sahélo-saharien. Par ailleurs, la revue accepte les articles empiriques, les revues de littérature, les analyses documentaires, etc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.115

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0060.013
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrias Culturais (Universidade de Coimbra)Same topicNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesFrench-language works237,207