MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6955331711 · doi:10.58079/nsyx

Colloque COSSI 2017 - Méthodes et stratégies de gestion de l'information par les organisations : des "big data" aux "thick data"

2016· article· fr· W6955331711 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Work (physics)Government (linguistics)Agency (philosophy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Co-organisateurs du colloque : Sylvie Grosjean (Université d’Ottawa, Canada), Monica Mallowan (Université de Moncton, Canada), Christian Marcon (IAE-Université de Poitiers, France) 85e congrès de l’ACFAS - Université McGill, Montréal Dates envisagées : 11 au 12 mai 2017 (en attente de la décision finale de l’ACFAS en décembre 2016) Dates importantes Soumission des propositions : 13 janvier 2017 Retour aux auteurs : février/mars 2017 Envoi des articles : mai 2017 Dates envisagées du c...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScholarly communication
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.871
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.179
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.356
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.007 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)Same topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207