MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6955336860 · doi:10.58079/aukc

Cartographie des potagers domestiques dans l’arrondissement Ahuntsic-Cartierville (Montréal)

2022· article· fr· W6955336860 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrias Culturais (Universidade de Coimbra) · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicSyphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Identification (biology)PopulationIncidence (geometry)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Une analyse cartographique de l'arrondissement Ahuntsic-Cartierville a permis de dénombrer 1 916 potagers individuels, dont 11 serres, cumulant une superficie totale cultivable de 36 145 m² (3,6ha). La superficie moyenne des jardins cartographiés est de 19 m², avec une médiane de 10 m². Le jardin le plus grand à avoir été identifié est de 130 m², et le plus petit est de 1 m². La superficie la plus fréquente est de 10 m². En comparant les données récoltées à la superficie terrestre de l’arron...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.193
Threshold uncertainty score0.388

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrias Culturais (Universidade de Coimbra)Same topicSyphilis Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207