MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6955540918 · doi:10.58079/nykh

Des déchets à l’économie circulaire : Publics, politiques et engagements citoyens

2017· article· fr· W6955540918 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFocus (optics)Context (archaeology)Face (sociological concept)Field (mathematics)Work (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le 20 octobre de 14h à 17h30 Lieu : Salle Caillemer, Université de Lyon 3 Organisé par L’atelier « Matières, énergie, déchets, territoires ‐Flux et circulations » De l’UMR EVS et Zéro Déchet Lyon. Introduction : Laurence Rocher The Up - and Down - stream Flows of Waste: Reflecting on Waste within Neo - liberal Capitalism Myra Hird, Professeure à Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada, Chercheure invitée à l’ENS Lyon. Discussion de « Waste, Environmental Politics and Dis/EngagedPublics » (MyraH...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.143

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0110.015
Scholarly communication0.0210.012
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.139
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)Same topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207