Approches sémantiques et morphosyntaxiques de la variation en français actuel. Traitement idéal des données dans les ouvrages de référence (dictionnaires / grammaires)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’Observatoire du français en Suisse romande et le Centre de dialectologie et d’étude du français régional de l’Université de Neuchâtel organisent du mercredi 4 novembre au vendredi 6 novembre 2015 la deuxième édition du colloque international DIA du français actuel. Cette seconde édition s’inscrit dans le prolongement d’un atelier d’études qui s’est tenu à l’Université de Gand en mai 2012 et du premier colloque international DIA du français actuel qui a eu lieu, l’année suivante, à l’université de Sherbrooke dans le cadre des activités du Centre d’analyse et de traitement informatique du français québécois (CATIFQ).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it