MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Feasibility and key technologies for the construction of salt cavern helium storage in China

2024· article· en· W6955601181 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSuperconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys
Canadian institutionsPetro-Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeliumChinaResource (disambiguation)Helium gasKey (lock)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<b>[Objective]</b> Due to the scarcity of helium resources, insufficient production, high external dependence and single source, the security situation of helium resources in China is very severe. Utilizing salt caverns for helium storage is a significantly advantageous technology for large-scale helium storage that can effectively guarantee the helium supply capacity and improve helium security. However,China is devoid of underground salt cavern helium storage in operation, and related research and construction are still in the stage of initial development, requiring targeted feasibility and key technology researches. <b>[Methods]</b> Based on an investigation of helium resources and helium storage construction as well as China's experience in salt cavern gas storage construction, the feasibility of salt cavern helium storage construction in China was analyzed, and the suggestions on the development of key technologies for salt cavern helium storage were proposed,such as site evaluation, airtightness evaluation, cavern construction, storage construction, and helium injection and extraction. <b>[Results]</b> China is facing a high risk of helium supply disruption, necessitating the enlargement of reserve capacity. Salt cavern is suitable for large-scale helium storage for its satisfying performance in security and airtightness. The construction of salt cavern helium storage is feasible to increase China's helium reserve, giving that China has abundant salt cavern resources and a technological base for cavern construction. In addition, it is necessary to perform targeted research on key technologies for salt cavern helium storage construction, considering the geological conditions and helium resource conditions for storage construction in China differ from those in foreign countries. The salt mine in the southeast coastal area is close to the import and consumption of helium, and the transportation cost is low, so it can be used as the preferred storage site for the construction of salt cavern helium storage in China. <b>[Conclusion]</b> It is recommended to construct salt cavern helium storage in China in stages.At the early stage, 1 to 2 helium storage caverns should be constructed to explore and verify the construction technology of helium storage and ensure a stable supply of helium in China, after that more caverns should be constructed gradually to build up a strategic reserve that can meet China's helium demand for 5 to 10 years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.148
Threshold uncertainty score0.934

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.158
GPT teacher head0.496
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicSuperconductivity in MgB2 and AlloysFrench-language works237,207