MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6955666683 · doi:10.58079/tnc3

Un aperçu du RDV des LéA “Sens et valeurs des projets menés dans les recherches collaboratives”

2023· article· fr· W6955666683 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrias Culturais (Universidade de Coimbra) · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicResearch Data Management Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)FrontierLimiting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce RDV s'est déroulé le 18 janvier 2023 et a prolongé la Rencontre internationale de mai 2022 en questionnant la manière dont les LéA se sont emparés des apports, réflexions et outils proposés lors de cet événement sur le sens et les valeurs des projets menés dans les recherches collaboratives. Les témoignages de deux LéA ont permis d'initier la réflexion et les échanges avec les participants. Isabelle Nizet (Université de Sherbrooke, Québec) a conclu ce RDV auquel près de 40 personnes ont p...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesScholarly communication
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.452
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.009
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.036
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.280
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.089 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrias Culturais (Universidade de Coimbra)Same topicResearch Data Management PracticesFrench-language works237,207