MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6955935310 · doi:10.58079/qtn1

Panel DIREPA au congrès DNC3ALED, 2019

2019· article· fr· W6955935310 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Processing and 3D Reconstruction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentification (biology)Work (physics)Point (geometry)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le congrès DNC3ALED, 11-14 septembre 2019, a aussi réuni un panel DIREPA. La thématique du congrès a été "Savoir et pouvoir dans un monde polycentrique" PANEL DIREPA. Usages des références historique dans le discours journalistique européen Isabelle Boyer, Université de Cergy-Pontoise, LT2D, La grande guerre : Etude comparative des représentations sociales dans deux médias en ligne : le Figaro et l’Actu Elisabeth Le, University of Alberta, Brexit in Le Monde’s historical perspective: a th...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.783
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.046
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.034

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)Same topicImage Processing and 3D ReconstructionFrench-language works237,207