MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6957594543 · doi:10.60692/achn6-yh168

Measurement of Higgs boson production in the diphoton decay channel inppcollisions at center-of-mass energies of 7 and 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector

2014· article· en· W6957594543 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueGreater South Information System · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Processing and 3D Reconstruction
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalInstitute of Particle PhysicsUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHiggs bosonLarge Hadron ColliderAtlas (anatomy)Atlas detectorBosonATLAS experimentStandard Model (mathematical formulation)Detector

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A measurement of the production processes of the recently discovered Higgs boson is performed in the two-photon final state using $4.5\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{fb}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ of proton-proton collisions data at $\sqrt{s}=7\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{TeV}$ and $20.3\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{fb}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ at $\sqrt{s}=8\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{TeV}$ collected by the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider. The number of observed Higgs boson decays to diphotons divided by the corresponding Standard Model prediction, called the signal strength, is found to be $\ensuremath{\mu}=1.17\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.27$ at the value of the Higgs boson mass measured by ATLAS, ${m}_{H}=125.4\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{GeV}$. The analysis is optimized to measure the signal strengths for individual Higgs boson production processes at this value of ${m}_{H}$. They are found to be ${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\mathrm{ggF}}=1.32\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.38$, ${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\mathrm{VBF}}=0.8\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.7$, ${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{WH}=1.0\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1.6$, ${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{ZH}={0.1}_{\ensuremath{-}0.1}^{+3.7}$, and ${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{t\overline{t}H}={1.6}_{\ensuremath{-}1.8}^{+2.7}$, for Higgs boson production through gluon fusion, vector-boson fusion, and in association with a $W$ or $Z$ boson or a top-quark pair, respectively. Compared with the previously published ATLAS analysis, the results reported here also benefit from a new energy calibration procedure for photons and the subsequent reduction of the systematic uncertainty on the diphoton mass resolution. No significant deviations from the predictions of the Standard Model are found.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGreater South Information System→Same topicImage Processing and 3D Reconstruction→French-language works237,207→