MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6957754405 · doi:10.60692/fkvx3-zxr45

Contrasting effects of different pH ‐raising materials on N 2 O emissions in acidic upland soils

2020· article· en· W6957754405 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueGreater South Information System · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNitrificationArable landSoil waterSoil pHManureEnvironmental remediationSoil acidificationGreenhouse gas

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Acidic soils, occupying ca. 40% of the world's arable soils, often need to be managed (e.g., to raise their pH and to improve crop productivity); however, the environmental impact of raising soil pH is often difficult to assess. Increasing soil pH stimulates the reduction of N 2 O to N 2 , thus lowering N 2 O emissions associated with denitrification, but can also increase autotrophic nitrification rates and related N 2 O emission. Using a 15 N tracing technique, we provide process‐based insights into the effects of two acid‐neutralizing materials (quicklime [CaO] vs. pig manure) on N 2 O emissions in an acidified upland soil that had experienced excessive N application. Without pH adjustments we found that N 2 O emissions, stimulated by supply of reactive N, were related to denitrification‐ and heterotrophic nitrification‐derived N 2 O emissions, whereas autotrophic nitrification‐derived N 2 O emissions declined with decreasing soil pH. These effects were reversed by increasing soil pH via liming. However, increasing the soil pH via application of pig manure significantly increased soil N 2 O emissions from both nitrification and denitrification. Our study highlights that pH‐amelioration practices may enhance N 2 O emissions depending on the type of material applied to the soil. Therefore, both pH remediation and greenhouse gas mitigation options need to be considered together to avoid adverse environmental effects. The effect of different acid‐neutralizing materials on soil N 2 O emissions should be incorporated into ecosystem models to better estimate global N 2 O emissions when pH amelioration is practised. Highlights Enhanced N 2 O emission by N input was from denitrification and heterotrophic nitrification. Chemical N input and liming have reversible effects on N 2 O emission. Soil N 2 O emission was decreased by liming but increased by animal manure input. Careful consideration of pH raising substrates is needed to avoid adverse effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGreater South Information System→Same topicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics→French-language works237,207→