Data associated with the 2019 Freshwater Oil Spill Remediation Study (FOReSt) assessing the use of enhanced Monitored Natural Recovery (eMNR) and shoreline washing agent (SWA) of diluted bitumen spills conducted in shoreline enclosures at the IISD Experimental Lakes Area, ON, Canada from 2019 to 2020
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The following package includes data from the 2019 Freshwater Oil spill Remediation Study (FOReSt) at the IISD Experimental Lakes Area studying the use of enhanced monitored natural recovery (eMNR) and shoreline washing agent (SWA) as a secondary remediation method for diluted bitumen spills in freshwater shoreline enclosures. This package includes data tables on polycyclic aromatic compound chemistry in water and sediments, basic water quality, nutrient chemistry, and tritium chemistry monitored in the experimental and reference enclosures, and lake reference sites over the duration of the study. Data included in this package was first collected and used in the paper by Palace et al., titled Polycyclic aromatic compounds in freshwater ecosystems following non-invasive remediation of controlled diluted bitumen spills: The Freshwater Oil Spill Remediation Study (FOReSt) at the Experimental Lakes Area, Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it