MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6957875552 · doi:10.60692/6ekg8-d6754

Genomics of perivascular space burden unravels early mechanisms of cerebral small vessel disease

2021· article· en· W6957875552 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueGreater South Information System · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalSickKids FoundationUniversity of TorontoMcGill UniversityHospital for Sick ChildrenMcGill Genome Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerivascular spaceMendelian randomizationDiseaseWhite matterCADASILGenomicsGenetic associationGenome-wide association studyMagnetic resonance imaging

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Perivascular space burden (PVS) is an emerging and possibly the earliest magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-marker of cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD), a leading cause of stroke and dementia. Its molecular underpinnings are unknown. Genome-wide and whole-exome association studies in 40,095 participants (21 population-based cohorts, 66.3±8.6 years) revealed 24 genome-wide significant PVS risk loci. These showed association with white matter PVS already at age 20, suggesting an important role of early-life factors. PVS loci were enriched in genes causing early-onset leukodystrophies and genes expressed in fetal brain endothelial cells. Mendelian randomization analyses supported causal associations of high blood pressure with basal ganglia (BG) and hippocampal PVS, and of BG PVS with stroke. Transcriptome-wide association studies suggest causal implication of 11 genes, to prioritize for experimental follow-up as putative biotargets for cSVD. Two-thirds of PVS loci point to novel pathways, involving extracellular matrix, membrane transport, and developmental processes, with enrichment in targets of existing drugs for vascular/cognitive disorders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGreater South Information System→Same topicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus→French-language works237,207→