MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6957921761 · doi:10.60692/g8gf6-fmq27

Evidence forChlamydia trachomatisas a Human Papillomavirus Cofactor in the Etiology of Invasive Cervical Cancer in Brazil and the Philippines

2002· article· en· W6957921761 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueGreater South Information System · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInnovations in Aquaponics and Hydroponics Systems
Canadian institutionsHealth Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChlamydia trachomatisCervical cancerEtiologyHPV infectionRisk factorHuman papillomavirusChlamydiaPapillomaviridaeAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chlamydia trachomatis infection was examined as a cause of invasive cervical cancer (ICC) among women with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. In total, 499 women with incident ICC (ICC patients) and 539 control patients from São Paulo, Brazil, and Manila, the Philippines, were included. C. trachomatis antibodies were detected by microimmunofluorescence assay. Presence of HPV DNA in cervical specimens was determined by a polymerase chain reaction-based assay. C. trachomatis seropositivity was associated with sexual behavior but not with HPV infection. C. trachomatis increased the risk of squamous cervical cancer among HPV-positive women (odds ratio, 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-4.0). Results were similar in both countries. There was a suggestion of increasing squamous cancer risk with increasing C. trachomatis antibody titers. This large study examined C. trachomatis and cervical cancer, taking into account the central role of HPV infection. C. trachomatis infection was found to be a possible cofactor of HPV in the etiology of squamous cervical cancer, and its effect may be mediated by chronic inflammation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.211
Threshold uncertainty score0.143

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGreater South Information SystemSame topicInnovations in Aquaponics and Hydroponics SystemsFrench-language works237,207