Latent Space Model for Higher-order Networks and Generalized Tensor Decomposition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We introduce a unified framework, formulated as general latent space models, to study complex higher-order network interactions among multiple entities. Our framework covers several popular models in recent network analysis literature, including mixture multi-layer latent space model and hypergraph latent space model. We formulate the relationship between the latent positions and the observed data via a generalized multilinear kernel as the link function. While our model enjoys decent generality, its maximum likelihood parameter estimation is also convenient via a generalized tensor decomposition procedure. We propose a novel algorithm using projected gradient descent on Grassmannians. We also develop original theoretical guarantees for our algorithm. First, we show its linear convergence under mild conditions. Second, we establish finite-sample statistical error rates of latent position estimation, determined by the signal strength, degrees of freedom and the smoothness of link function, for both general and specific latent space models. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method on synthetic data. We also showcase the merit of our method on two real-world datasets that are conventionally described by different specific models in producing meaningful and interpretable parameter estimations and accurate link prediction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".