PHILOSOPHICAL THEISM OF PETER LINITSKY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Linitsky is a typical representative of the Kiev school of philosophical theism, a philosopher deeply religious, able to find value guidelines in the Christian spiritual tradition, the critical thinking of which is organically combined with intellectual tolerance.G. Shpet, the researcher of the history of Russian philosophy of the first quarter of the twentieth century noted, "in the general movement of our philosophical thought, the aforementioned question (the correlation of faith and knowledge -N.M.) was destined to occupy only a subordinate place, since it, as a particular issue of the Orthodox faith and European knowledge, became a more significant problem for us and at the same time specific.But in one of the trends of our philosophy, he naturally took a dominant place: in the philosophy of Orthodox theological academies" [9, p. 369-370].One of the dominant places this issue occupied in the creative heritage of P. Linitsky.In this connection, the thinker's conclusions regarding the main tasks of philosophy acquire new content.As noted above, Linitsky sees them in solving two problems: 1) in creating a scientific philosophy, and 2) in reconciling science with religious faith, or in the ratio of faith and knowledge.How does Linitsky solve the last question?In any case, in order to correctly judge the position taken by the philosopher, one must consider his views in full.And then the image of a thinker will open up before us, for which reflection on the subject of faith was not a simple and fascinating argument, but an essential need for his inner life.Note that the theological and philosophical views of P. Linitsky were inherent more spiritual than religiosity.And in everyday life, according to the memoirs of his contemporaries, "church and liturgical rites were not for him what they were for a believing coal miner; he remained a Philosopher in the temple: the temple environment created a mood of closeness to the Absolute Spirit, the reflection on which was an essential moment of his philosophizing.The Eucharist was for him an act of the closest unity of the human spirit with the Absolute Spirit, but the subtleties of dogmatic disputes always seemed to him insignificant and inconsequential" [2, p.758].The most scrupulous and consistent question of the relationship between faith and knowledge is considered by Linitsky in his fundamental work "The Importance of Philosophy for Theology (A.Handbook for Apologetic Theology)" (1904).And although the Kiev philosopher always made a clear distinction between theology and philosophy, in this work he most clearly appears as a theologian and philosopher at the same time.If we proceed to the thinker's thoughts on the subject of faith, the philosopher first of all believes that "between faith as the acceptance of a ready truth and scientific research, the purpose of which is to know the same truth, the difference is not absolute, but only relative ... The need for scientific research is not limited to faith, but, on the contrary, is required by it.With a complete and comprehensive knowledge of the truth, faith itself would be superfluous.Faith
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".